Angiotensin 1-7 in severe COVID-19 patients: a phase 1 clinical trial
Valle Martins, A. L.; Annoni, F.; da Silva, F. A.; Bolais-Ramos, L.; Capanema de Oliveira, G.; dos Santos Matos, A. H.; Jardim Heyden, M. C.; Dias Pinheiro, B.; Abdo Rodrigues, N.; Alves Pereira, D. A.; Lana Diniz, M. M.; Granato Fonseca Silva, T.; Carvalho Cardoso, A.; Carvalho Martins, J.; Motta-Santos, D.; Campagnole-Santos, M. J.; Verano-Braga, T.; Taccone, F. S.; Santos, R. A. S.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe coronavirus-related disease (COVID-19) is mainly characterized by a respiratory involvement, with few available therapeutics for critically cases. The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) has a relevant role in the pathogenesis of COVID-19, as the virus enter hosts cells via the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and RAS disequilibrium promote inflammation and fibrosis. Exogenous angiotensin-(1-7) might modulate RAS in COVID-19 patients; however, no data on its safety are available in this setting. MethodsThis investigator-initiated, open label, phase I clinical trial was conducted to test the safety of intravenous administration of Angiotensin-(1-7) in severe COVID-19 patients admitted in two intensive care units (ICU) in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. In addition to standard of care, intravenous administration of Angiotensin-(1-7) was started at 5 mcg/Kg*day and increased to 10 mcg/Kg*day after 24 hours and continued for a maximum of 7 days or until ICU discharge. The rate of serious adverse events (SAEs) served as the primary outcome of the study. ResultsBetween August and December 2020, 28 patients were included (mean age of 55.8{+/-}12.0 years). All but one patient underwent dose escalation after 24 hours and 8 (28.5%) received the treatment until day 7. No significant differences in mean blood pressure and heart rate were observed before and after the initiation of the drug. During the period of intervention, 5/28 (17.8%) patients required vasopressors, 4 at low dose norepinephrine (i.e. <0.05 mcg/kg*min), while one patient required higher doses because of septic shock. One patient presented with sinus bradycardia, which was considered possibly related to the study drug and resolved after discontinuation. Six patients (21.4%) died before ICU discharge. ConclusionsIntravenous infusion of Angiotensin-(1-7) up to 10 mcg/Kg*day was safe in severe COVID-19 patients and could represent a potential therapeutic strategy in this setting. Trial RegistrationRegistro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clinicos, UTN code: U1111-1255-7167, registered on 08/05/2020; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04633772; retrospectively registered on November 18 2020
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Plasma ACE2 levels predict outcome of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients 95%
- Safety and effectiveness of RBD-specific polyclonal equine F(ab′)2 fragments for the treatment of hospitalized patients with severe Covid-19 disease: a retrospective cohort study 94%
- Does the Antisecretory Peptide AF-16 modulate fluid balance and inflammation in experimental peritonitis induced sepsis? 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Centhaquine Increases Stroke Volume and Cardiac Output in Patients with Hypovolemic Shock 95%
- Administration of tocilizumab to patients with high concentrations of IL-6 in the course of COVID-19 is associated with a better prognosis 95%
- Efficacy of remdesivir-containing therapy in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: a prospective clinical experience 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Standard blood laboratory results in SARS-CoV-19 positive patients: do they show a typical pattern? 93%
- Randomized controlled trial of convalescent plasma therapy against standard therapy in patients with severe COVID-19 disease 92%
- The use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors but not angiotensin receptor blockers in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 is associated with a lower risk of mortality 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.