A rapid review of the effectiveness of remote consultations versus face-to-face consultations in secondary care surgical outpatient settings
Edwards, D.; Csontos, J.; Gillen, L.; Carrier, J.; Lewis, R.; Cooper, A.; Edwards, A. G.
Show abstract
The use of remote consultations and telemedicine approaches significantly increased over the pandemic. There is evidence that some patients still prefer this mode of care delivery and time saving may also enable additional consultations and help to reduce waiting lists. However, the effectiveness of remote consulting for certain specialities, such as surgery, is unclear. The aim of this review was to investigate the effectiveness of video or telephone consultations, particularly focusing on clinical, patient reported and safety outcomes, in adult secondary surgical outpatient care during the COVID-19 pandemic. 14 studies were identified. These were published in 2021-2022. Evidence is low or very-low quality due to observational study designs, small sample sizes and patient selection. Policy and practice implications: Evidence is of low quality but suggests that for many surgical outpatient consultations, remote consultations are as effective as in-person consultations. There is potential for time and cost savings for remote consultations compared to in-person consultations. High quality research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of remote consultations to understand which patients and which surgical specialities would benefit most. Funding statementThe Wales Centre for Evidence Based Care was funded for this work by the Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre, itself funded by Health & Care Research Wales on behalf of Welsh Government.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Perioperative mortality in low-, middle-, and high-income countries: Protocol for a multi-level meta-regression analysis 94%
- Effectiveness of early versus delayed rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair: systematic review and meta-analyses 94%
- Triaging and Referring In Adjacent General and Emergency Departments (the TRIAGE trial): a cluster randomised controlled trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Doctors of chiropractic working with or within integrated health care delivery systems: a scoping review protocol 94%
- Surgery & COVID-19: A rapid scoping review of the impact of COVID-19 on surgical services during public health emergencies 94%
- Guided relaxation-based virtual reality versus distraction-based virtual reality or passive control for postoperative pain management in children and adolescents undergoing Nuss repair of pectus excavatum: protocol for a prospective, randomized, controlled trial (FOREVR Peds trial) 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Validation of Collaborative Robot-assisted Cutting Method for Iliac Crest Flap Raising: Randomized Crossover Trial 92%
- Researcher and Clinician Preferences for a Journal Transparency Tool: A Mixed-Methods Survey and Focus Group Study 90%
- Immediate effect of osteopathic techniques on human resting muscle tone in healthy subjects using myotonometry: A factorial randomized trial 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The effect of osteotomy technique (flat-cut vs wedge-cut Weil) on pain relief and complication incidence following surgical treatment for patients presenting with metatarsalgia in a private metropolitan clinic: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial 94%
- The smallest worthwhile effect on pain and function for rotator cuff repair surgery: a benefit-harm trade-off study 90%
- Electronic early notification of sepsis in hospitalized ward patients: a study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Student self-assessment: feasibility, advantages and limitations Example of a workshop for trainee surgeons using a suture score 93%
- Large language models for generating medical examinations: systematic review 92%
- Improving capacity for advanced training in obstetric surgery: Evaluation of a blended learning approach 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.