Gene Expression Profiles Reveal Potential Targets for Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Nasirpour, M. H.; Sabery Anvar, M.; Nasirpour, A.; Salimi, M.; Sepahyr, S.; Minuchehr, Z.
Show abstract
Figuring out the molecular mechanisms underlying breast cancer is essential for the diagnosis and treatment of this invasive disorder. Hence it is important to identify the most significant genes correlated with molecular events and to study their interactions in order to identify breast cancer mechanisms. Here we focus on the gene expression profiles, which we have detected in breast cancer. High-throughput genomic innovations such as microarray have helped us understand the complex dynamics of multisystem diseases such as diabetes and cancer. We performed an analysis using microarray datasets by the Networkanalyst bioinformatics tool, based on a random effect model (REM). We achieved pivotal differential expressed genes like ADAMTS5, SCARA5, IGSF10, and C2orf40 that had the most down-regulation, and also COL10A1, COL11A1, and UHRF1 that they had the most up-regulation in four-stage of breast cancer. We used CentiScape and AllegroMCODE plugins in CytoScape software in order to figure out hub genes in the protein-protein interactions network. Besides, we utilized DAVID online software to find involved biological pathways and Gene ontology, also used Expression2kinase software in order to find upstream regulatory transcription factors and kinases. In conclusion, we have found that the statistical network inference approach is useful in gene prioritization and is capable of contributing to practical network signature discovery and providing insights into the mechanisms relevant to the disease. Our research has also identified novel transcription factors, kinases, pathways, and genes that may serve as important targets for the development of diagnostic biomarkers and treatments.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Directed Bayesian Networks established functional differences between breast cancer subtypes 96%
- A proteomic perspective and involvement of cytokines in SARS-CoV-2 infection 95%
- The inhibitory effects of butein on cell proliferation and TNF-α-induced CCL2 release in racially different triple negative breast cancer cells 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- In silico analysis of SNPs in human phosphofructokinase, Muscle (PFKM) gene: An apparent therapeutic target of aerobic glycolysis and cancer 97%
- Identification of Dysregulated Pathways and key genes in Human Retinal Angiogenesis using Microarray Metadata 95%
- Interleukin- 10 (IL-10) gene polymorphisms and prostate cancer susceptibility: evidence from a meta-analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- PDAC-ANN: an artificial neural network to predict Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma based on gene expression 97%
- Comparative transcriptome of normal and cancer- associated fibroblasts 96%
- Effectiveness of educational intervention on breast cancer knowledge and breast self-examination among female university students in Bangladesh: a pre-post quasi-experimental one group study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Classification models for Invasive Ductal Carcinoma Progression, based on gene expression data-trained supervised machine learning 98%
- Discovering Key Transcriptomic Regulators in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma using Dirichlet Process Gaussian Mixture Model 95%
- Machine learning prediction of antiviral-HPV protein interactions for anti-HPV pharmacotherapy 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Systems biomedicine of primary and metastatic colorectal cancer reveals potential therapeutic targets 96%
- Absence of Glutathione S-Transferase Theta 1 Gene is Significantly Associated with Breast Cancer Susceptibility in Pakistani Population and Poor Overall Survival in Breast Cancer Patients: A Case-Control and Case Series Analysis 95%
- Patient stratification of clear cell renal cell carcinoma using the global transcription factor activity landscape derived from RNA-seq data 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.