Physicians Attitudes towards Secondary Use of Clinical Data for Biomedical Research Purposes in Germany. Results of a Quantitative Survey.
Köngeter, A.; Schickhardt, C.; Jungkunz, M.; Winkler, E. C.; Mehlis, K.
Show abstract
BackgroundFor biomedical data-driven research purposes, secondary use of clinical data carries great but largely untapped potential. Physicians attitudes and their needs towards secondary data use are essential to inform its practical and ethically sound implementation but are currently understudied. ObjectiveTherefore, the objectives of the study are to assess physicians (i) general attitudes and concerns, (ii) willingness to adapt workflows and to make data available for secondary use, (iii) group-specific conditions and concerns of physician-scientists and purely clinical physicians. MethodsWe developed an online survey based on a literature review and an expert interview study. Physicians in private practice and at two large German university hospitals were surveyed from May 2021 until January 2022. ResultsIn total, 446 physicians participated in the survey. 96% [380/397] of all physicians reported a positive attitude towards secondary use; 87% [31/397] are in-principle willing to support secondary use of clinical data along with a small proportion of physicians with fundamental reservations 8%. Secondly, the most important conditions for adapting workflows was funding of additional time and effort for research-adequate documentation (71% [286/390]) and the most important condition for providing patients clinical data was reliable protection of patients privacy (67% [254/382]). Thirdly, physician-scientists were more likely to request additional funding for research-adequate documentation as a precondition for support (83% vs 69%, P=.002) and the privilege to conduct research with patient data prior to other researchers (43% vs 11%, P<.001); while purely clinical physicians more frequently require reliable protection of patient privacy (76% vs 62%, P=.007) and monetary compensation (45% vs 25%, P<.001). ConclusionSince this study presents high in-principle willingness of physicians to support secondary use along with little general concerns, it seems essential to address physicians group-specific conditions toward secondary use in order to gain their support.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The challenges of replication: a worked example of methods reproducibility using routinely collected healthcare data 94%
- COVI-Prim survey: Challenges for Austrian and German general practitioners during initial phase of COVID-19 94%
- Wading through Molasses: A qualitative examination of the experiences, perceptions, attitudes, and knowledge of Australian medical practitioners regarding medical billing 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Physician experiences of electronic health records interoperability and its practical impact on care delivery in the English NHS: A cross-sectional survey study 94%
- Sunshine on KOL : a retrospective study about financial ties between medical key opinion leaders and pharmaceutical industry in France 93%
- What is the suitability of clinical vignettes in benchmarking the performance of online symptom checkers? An audit study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Revisiting the use and effectiveness of patient-held records in rural Malawi 92%
- A prospective evaluation of inter-rater agreement of routine medical records audits at a large general hospital in Sao Paulo, Brazil. 92%
- Management of the COVID-19 health crisis: A survey in Swiss hospital pharmacies 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring Patient and Staff Experiences of Video Consultations During COVID-19 in an English Outpatient Care Setting: Secondary Data Analysis of Routinely Collected Feedback Data 93%
- The Validity of the Parsley Symptom Index: an e-PROM designed for Telehealth 92%
- Improving emergency department patient-doctor conversation through an artificial intelligence symptom taking tool: an action-oriented design pilot study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- “I don’t know what to do or where to go”. Experiences of accessing healthcare support from the perspectives of people living with Long Covid and healthcare professionals: A qualitative study in Bradford, UK 91%
- Development and psychometric testing of EPAT-16: A short and valid measure for patient-centeredness from the patient’s perspective 91%
- Challenges of visibility and inclusion in Long COVID: a population-based interview study 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.