Back

Association between Blood N-3 Fatty Acid Levels and Risk for COVID-19 in the UK biobank

Harris, W. S.; Tintle, N. L.; Sathyanarayanan, S. P.; Westra, J.

2022-08-22 nutrition
10.1101/2022.08.19.22278992 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe role of nutritional status and risk for contracting and/or suffering adverse outcomes from SARS-CoV-2 infection is unclear. Preliminary studies suggest that higher n-3 PUFA intakes may be protective. ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to compare risk for three COVID-19 outcomes (testing positive for SARS-CoV-2, hospitalization, and death) as a function of baseline plasma DHA levels. MethodsDHA levels (% of total fatty acids) were measured by nuclear magnetic resonance. The three outcomes and relevant covariates were available for 110,584 subjects (hospitalization and death) and for 26,595 ever-tested subjects (positive for SARS-CoV-2) in the UK Biobank prospective cohort study. Outcome data between January 1, 2020 and March 23, 2021 were included. Omega-3 Index (red blood cell EPA+DHA%) values across DHA% quintiles were estimated. Multi-variable Cox-proportional hazards models were constructed and linear (per 1-SD) relations with risk for each outcome were computed as hazard ratios (HRs). ResultsIn the fully adjusted models, comparing the fifth to the first DHA% quintiles, the HR for testing positive (95% CI) was 0.79 (0.71, 0.89; p<0.001), for being hospitalized was 0.74 (0.58, 0.94; P<0.05), and for dying with COVID-19 was 1.04 (0.69, 1.57; NS). On a per 1-SD increase in DHA% basis, the HRs were: for testing positive, 0.92 (0.89,0.96; p<0.001); for hospitalization, 0.89 (0.83, 0.97; p<0.01); and for death, 0.95 (0.83,1.09). Estimated Omega-3 Index values across DHA quintiles ranged from 3.5% (quintile 1) to 8% (quintile 5). ConclusionsThese findings suggest that nutritional strategies to increase circulating n-3 PUFA levels, such as increased consumption of oily fish and/or use of n-3 fatty acid supplements, may reduce risk for adverse COVID-19 outcomes.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.