Can a knee sleeve influence ground reaction forces and knee joint power during a step-down hop in participants following ACL reconstruction? An explanatory analysis
Sole, G.; Pataky, T. C.; Hammer, N.; Lamb, P.
Show abstract
PurposeElastic knee sleeves are often worn following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction but mechanisms underlying observed changes in movement patterns are still unclear. The aim of this study was to determine the immediate and 6-week effects of wearing a knee sleeve on ground reaction forces (GRF) and knee joint power during a step-down hop task. MethodsUsing a cross-over design, we estimated GRF and knee kinematics and kinetics during a step-down hop for 30 participants (age 26.1 [SD 6.7] years, 14 women) following ACL reconstruction (median 16 months post-surgery) with and without wearing a knee sleeve. In a subsequent randomised clinical trial, participants in the Sleeve Group (n=9) then wore the sleeve for 6 weeks at least 1 hour daily, while a Control Group (n=9) did not wear the sleeve. Statistical parametric mapping (SPM) was used to compare (1) GRF trajectories in the three planes as well as knee joint power between three conditions at baseline (uninjured side, unsleeved injured and sleeved injured side); (2) within-participant changes for GRF and knee joint power trajectories from baseline to follow-up between groups. We also compared discrete peak GRFs and power, rate of (vertical) force development, and mean knee joint power in the first 5% of stance phase. ResultsGRF did not differ for the (unsleeved) injured compared to the uninjured sides based on SPM analysis. Discrete variables showed lower peak anterior (propulsive) GRF for the injured side, and lower peak eccentric and concentric power, and mean power in the first 5% of stance. When wearing the sleeve on the injured side, mean power in the first 5% of stance increased significantly [mean difference (95% CIs) 1.3 (0.6, 2.0) N/BW*ht] from a concentric to an eccentric power when wearing the knee sleeve. After six weeks, the direction of change for vertical GRF differed between the groups: while the Control Group had slightly decreased forces, the Sleeve Group presented increased forces. ConclusionsIncreased knee power in the first 5% of landing when wearing the knee sleeve, combined with greater knee flexion, may indicate a protective response for ACL ruptures, most commonly occurring during that early phase of landing. The directional change of increased vertical GRF for the Sleeve group, combined with shorter stance duration at follow-up, may indicate enhanced performance when being prescribed such sleeve.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Improved accuracy of the whole body Center of Mass position through Kalman filtering 92%
- Self-determination theory in physiotherapy practice: A rapid review of randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews 90%
- Comparing electromyography, accelerometry, and visual inspection to assess the resting motor threshold for transcranial magnetic stimulation 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Differences in external loads of different pitch types in Chinese male college baseball players 96%
- Head and body dyskinesia during gait in tactical athletes with vestibular deficit following concussion 96%
- Do anthropometric characteristics and physical capacities of highly trained junior badminton players differ according to age and sex? 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Investigation of Nonlinear Variability Underlying Postural Control in The Injure-Limb in Individuals with and without Chronic Ankle Instability 97%
- Does increased gait variability improve stability when faced with an expected balance perturbation during treadmill walking? 96%
- The effects of pressure on anticipatory postural adjustments during a jump shot in basketball 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Muscle activity of cutting manoeuvres and soccer inside passing suggests an increased groin injury risk during these movements 98%
- Joint contact forces during barefoot, minimal and conventional shod running are highly individual 96%
- Quantifying mechanical loading and elastic strain energy of the human Achilles tendon during walking and running 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.