How Have Global Scientists Responded to Tackling COVID-19?
Cao, L.; Hou, W.
Show abstract
Since the outbreak of COVID-19, the global scientific communities across almost all countries have made urgent, intensive, and continuous effort on understanding, fighting and modeling the COVID-19 pandemic. COVID-19 research turns out to be the first overwhelming global scientific reaction to significant global crises and threats. This literature analysis report collects and summarizes the profiles, trends, quality and impact of this global scientific response. It collects and analyzes 346,267 scientific references in English, involving researchers from 189 countries and regions in 27 subject areas. The report generates a picture of how global scientists have responded to COVID-19 between Jan 2020 and Mar 2022 in terms of their publication quantity, impact, focused major problems, and research areas and methods over country/region, discipline and time and collaboratively. The report also captures broad-reaching distributions and trends of modeling COVID-19 by AI, data science, analytics, shallow and deep machine learning, epidemic modeling, applied mathematics, and social science methods, etc. We further show the correlations between publication quality and quantity and economic status and COVID-19 infections globally and in major countries and regions. The literature analysis results of this global scientific response to COVID-19 present a comprehensive global, regional and subject-specific picture of the significant cross-disciplinary, cross-country, cross-problem, and cross-technique profiles and differences of the COVID-19 publication quantity and quality. The report also discloses significant imbalances in the COVID-19 research across countries/regions, subject areas, problems, topics, methods, research collaborations, and economic statuses. We share the source and analytical data of this global literature analysis for further research on this unprecedented and future crises. More Information about COVID-19 ModelingO_ST_ABSThe COVID-19 global scientists response datasetC_ST_ABSThe COVID-19 global scientists response dataset supporting this report can be found in Kaggle at: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/datascienceslab/covid19-global-scientists-response, Dataset doi: 10.34740/kaggle/dsv/4077649. More information about COVID-19 modelingInterested readers may refer to the following review on modeling COVID-19 which complements this global literature analysis: Longbing Cao and Qing Liu, COVID-19 Modeling: A Review, 1-103, 2022 (version 2). Accessible at medRxiv: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.08.22.22279022v1. More information about COVID-19 modeling, including the analytical results of this report and data and review on COVID-19 can be found at: https://datasciences.org/covid19-modeling. Citation of this reportLongbing Cao and Wenfeng Hou. How have global scientists responded to tackling COVID-19? Full technical report, https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.16.22278871, Data Science Lab, University of Technology Sydney, 2022.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Application and Significance of SIRVB Model in Analyzing COVID-19 Dynamics 93%
- Pareto-based evaluation of national responses to COVID-19 pandemic shows that saving lives and protecting economy are non-trade-off objectives 92%
- Tensor decomposition- and principal component analysis-based unsupervised feature extraction to select more reasonable differentially expressed genes: Optimization of standard deviation versus state-of-art methods 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Adaptive time-dependent priors and Bayesian inference to evaluate SARS-CoV-2 public health measures validated on 31 countries 92%
- Identification, analysis and prediction of valid and false information related to vaccines from Romanian tweets 91%
- Uncovering COVID-19 Transmission Tree: Identifying Traced and Untraced Infections in an Infection Network 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- VICTOR: A visual analytics web application for comparing cluster sets 91%
- AE-LGBM: Sequence-Based Novel Approach To Detect Interacting Protein Pairs via Ensemble of Autoencoder and LightGBM. 91%
- Enrichment analysis on regulatory subspaces: a novel direction for the superior description of cellular responses to SARS-CoV-2 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.