Back

Study Protocol for a Research and Development Project: Optimizing a Unified Parent Training Intervention to Prevent Child Mental Health Problems and Neglect

Toemmeraas, T.; Backer-Grondahl, A.; Arnesen, A.; Apeland, A.; Laland, H.; Askeland, E.; Kjobli, J.; Idsoe, T.; Gronlie, A. A.; Gomez, M. B.; Karlsson, L. R. A.; Dyrkoren, E.; Torsvik, S.; Hostmaelingen, A.; Amlund-Hagen, K.; Forgatch, M.; Fisher, P. A.

2022-08-19 health systems and quality improvement
10.1101/2022.08.16.22278822 medRxiv
Show abstract

This protocol describes a research and development (R&D) project aimed at optimizing a targeted, preventive, efficacious, and tailored intervention called Supportive Parents - Coping Kids (SPARCK). Combining recent developments in basic and intervention research, the goal of this project is to develop, test and optimize a unified parent training intervention targeting children who display externalizing and internalizing symptoms and parents who are at risk of exhibiting maladaptive or neglectful parenting behaviors. We plan to utilize various design-based research methodologies to investigate what works for whom in which context, points which are essential to the innovation process, by employing a mixed methods research design and an iterative optimization process of testing and refinement. Furthermore, we introduce a cocreation process for SPARCK to involve relevant stakeholders working in Norwegian frontline services for children and their families to ensure that the intervention adheres to the needs and constraints encountered by these stakeholders and thereby promote the scalability and sustainable implementation of SPARCK. In this paper, we present the theoretical and methodological background of this approach to R&D in the field of mental health prevention as well as the operationalization of innovative methodology in the current project. This R&D approach aims to produce new knowledge concerning individual change mechanisms in parent training interventions and stakeholder feedback pertaining to intervention components and implementation strategies, all of which are imperative for the iterative SPARCK design process.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 4%
26.9%
2
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.9%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
10.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.0%
5
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
6
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
7
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
8
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
9
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
10
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.5%
11
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.4%
12
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
14
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
15
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
16
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
17
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
19
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
20
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
21
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
22
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
23
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
24
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%