Preoperative Clinical Practice Guidelines For Elective Surgery. Methodological And Quality Appraisal Study.
Angel, G.; Trujillo, C.; Mallama, M.; Alonso-Coello, P.; Klimek, M.; Calvache, J. A.
Show abstract
BackgroundClinical practice guidelines (CPG) are statements that provide recommendations regarding the approach to different diseases and aim to increase quality while decrease the risk of complications in health care. Numerous guidelines in the field of perioperative care have been published in the previous decade but their methodological quality and transparency are relatively unknown. ObjectiveTo critically evaluate the transparency and methodological quality of published CPG in the preoperative assessment and management of adult patients undergoing elective surgery. DesignDescriptive methodological study and quality appraisal. Data sourcesWe searched for eligible CPG published in English or Spanish between January 1, 2010, and June 30, 2022, in MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, as well as in representatives medical societies of Anaesthesiology and developers of CPG. Eligibility criteriaCPG dedicated on preoperative fasting, cardiac assessment for non-cardiac surgery, and the use of routine preoperative tests were included. Methodological quality and transparency of CPG were assessed by 3 evaluators using the 6 domains of the AGREE-II tool. ResultsWe included 20 CPG of which 14 were classified as recommended guidelines. The domain of "applicability" scored the lowest (44%), while the domains "scope and objective" and "editorial interdependence" received the highest median scores of 93% and 97% respectively. The remaining domains received scores ranging from 44% to 84%. The top mean scored CPG in preoperative fasting was ASA 2017 (93%); among cardiac evaluation, CPG for non-cardiac surgery were CCS 2017 (91%), ESC-ESA 2014 (90%), and AHA-ACC 2014 (89%); in preoperative testing ICSI 2020 (97%). ConclusionsIn the last ten years, most published CPG in the preoperative assessment or management of adult patients undergoing elective surgery focused on preoperative fasting, cardiac assessment for non-cardiac surgery, and use of routine preoperative tests, present moderate to high methodological quality and can be recommended for their use or adaptation. Applicability and stakeholder involvement domains must be improved in the development of future guidelines.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Perioperative mortality in low-, middle-, and high-income countries: Protocol for a multi-level meta-regression analysis 94%
- Association between epidural catheter tip malposition and anesthesiologists’ experience after graduation: a cross-sectional study using postoperative CT images 94%
- Prohibiting Babel - A call for professional remote interpreting services in pre-operation anaesthesia information 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of Virtually Led Value-Based Preoperative Assessment on Safety, Efficiency, and Patient and Professional Satisfaction 95%
- Artificial Intelligence in laryngeal endoscopy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 92%
- Evaluating the Association and Predictability of Complex Medication Regimen Scores with Clinical Outcomes Among the Critically Ill 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Findings of a feasibility study of pre-operative pulmonary rehabilitation to reduce post-operative pulmonary complications in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease scheduled for major abdominal surgery. 91%
- A cross-sectional audit and survey of Open Science and Data Sharing practices at The Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital 90%
- Recommendations from long-term care reports, commissions, and inquiries in Canada 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Predictive Nomogram for In-ICU Deterioration of Stage 1 Pressure Injuries: A Retrospective Study 90%
- Emerging Applications of NLP and Large Language Models in Gastroenterology and Hepatology: A Systematic Review 90%
- Self-health Management and Role of Nurses of Diabetic Patients: A systematic review during COVID-19 Pandemic 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical practice competencies for standard critical care nursing: Consensus statement based on a systematic review and Delphi survey 94%
- Hydrocortisone for the prevention of postoperative delirium in digestive surgery (HyPOD): Study protocol for a multicentre randomized, blind, placebo-controlled trial 93%
- Surgery & COVID-19: A rapid scoping review of the impact of COVID-19 on surgical services during public health emergencies 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.