The use of artificial intelligence and machine learning methods in first trimester pre-eclampsia screening: a systematic review protocol
Hedley, P. L.; Hagen, C. M.; Wilstrup, C.; Christiansen, M.
Show abstract
IntroductionPre-eclampsia (PE) is a leading cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Low-dose aspirin can prevent PE in high risk pregnancies if started early. However, despite intense research into the area, first-trimester screening for PE risk is still not a routine part of pregnancy care. Several studies have described the application of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in risk prediction of PE and its subtypes. A systematic review of available literature is necessary to catalogue the current applications of AI/ML methods in early pregnancy screening for PE, in order to better inform the development of clinically relevant risk prediction algorithms which will enable timely intervention and the development of new treatment strategies. The aim of this systematic review is to identify and assess studies regarding the application of AI/ML methods in first-trimester screening for PE. MethodsA systematic review of peer-reviewed as well as the grey literature cohort or case-control studies will be conducted. Relevant information will be accessed from the following databases; PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Arxiv, BioRxiv, and MedRxiv. The studies will be evaluated by two reviewers in a parallel, blind assessment of the literature, a third reviewer will assess any studies in which the first two reviewers did not agree. The free online tool Rayyan, will be used in this literature assessment stage. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 checklist will be used to guide the review process and the methods of the studies will be assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Narrative synthesis will be conducted for all included studies. Meta-analysis will also be conducted where data quality and availability allow. Ethics and disseminationThe review will not require ethical approval and the findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal using the PRISMA guidelines.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 and pregnancy: An umbrella review of clinical presentation, vertical transmission, and maternal and perinatal outcomes 95%
- Experience in the implementation of the early warning sign system in obstetric patients (Maternal Early Warning Criteria, MEWC) during early postpartum. A prospective observational study 94%
- Protocol for a sequential, prospective meta-analysis to describe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the pregnancy and postpartum periods 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Proton pump inhibitors use and risk of preeclampsia 95%
- A Call For Better Methodological Quality Of Reviews On Using Artificial Intelligence For COVID-19 Detection In Medical Imaging – An Umbrella Systematic Review 93%
- Screening for Right Ventricular Dysfunction in the Emergency Department Using a Smartphone ECG Analysis Application: An External Validation Study with Acute Pulmonary Embolism Patients 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Corticosteroids for improving patient relevant outcomes in HELLP syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis 95%
- Comparison of first trimester dating methods for gestational age estimation and their implication on preterm birth classification in a North Indian cohort 94%
- Maternal and perinatal characteristics and outcomes of pregnancies complicated with COVID-19 in Kuwait 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrating clinical factors and parity-specific models with molecular biomarkers to better predict the risk of preterm birth in asymptomatic women 94%
- Neonatal outcomes after proteomic biomarker-guided intervention: the AVERT PRETERM TRIAL 91%
- Safety of anti-thrombotic therapy in acute aortic dissection; single center, observational study 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.