Back

The use of artificial intelligence and machine learning methods in first trimester pre-eclampsia screening: a systematic review protocol

Hedley, P. L.; Hagen, C. M.; Wilstrup, C.; Christiansen, M.

2022-07-21 obstetrics and gynecology
10.1101/2022.07.20.22277873 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionPre-eclampsia (PE) is a leading cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Low-dose aspirin can prevent PE in high risk pregnancies if started early. However, despite intense research into the area, first-trimester screening for PE risk is still not a routine part of pregnancy care. Several studies have described the application of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in risk prediction of PE and its subtypes. A systematic review of available literature is necessary to catalogue the current applications of AI/ML methods in early pregnancy screening for PE, in order to better inform the development of clinically relevant risk prediction algorithms which will enable timely intervention and the development of new treatment strategies. The aim of this systematic review is to identify and assess studies regarding the application of AI/ML methods in first-trimester screening for PE. MethodsA systematic review of peer-reviewed as well as the grey literature cohort or case-control studies will be conducted. Relevant information will be accessed from the following databases; PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Arxiv, BioRxiv, and MedRxiv. The studies will be evaluated by two reviewers in a parallel, blind assessment of the literature, a third reviewer will assess any studies in which the first two reviewers did not agree. The free online tool Rayyan, will be used in this literature assessment stage. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 checklist will be used to guide the review process and the methods of the studies will be assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Narrative synthesis will be conducted for all included studies. Meta-analysis will also be conducted where data quality and availability allow. Ethics and disseminationThe review will not require ethical approval and the findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal using the PRISMA guidelines.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.