Back

Identification of splicing defects caused by novel exonic mutations in LEF1 in Sudanese B- chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients: computational approach

Eltayeb, E. A. A. E.; Gameel, F. M.; Idris, A. B.; Dawoud, E. d.; Mukhtar, H. S. E. H.; Mohieldein, A. H.; Mutlu, M. B.; Ali, I. A. E. M.; Gassoum, A.; Hassan, M. A.

2022-07-19 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2022.07.18.22277759 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundLymphocyte enhancer factor-1 (LEF-1) is a member of the LEF-1/TCF family of transcription factors that are critically involved in canonical Wnt/{beta}-catenin Signaling to regulate B Lymphocyte proliferation and survival. Alteration of LEF1 expression and function leads to leukemogenesis as well as other several neoplasms. Aimsto identify mutations in exons two and three of the LEF1 among B-CLL Sudanese patients. Also, to functionally analyze the detected SNPs using different in silico tools. Materials and methodsImmuno-phenotype for the detection of B cells CD5 and CD19 markers was performed on 128 B-CLL Sudanese patients by using a flow cytometry technique. DNA extraction, conventional PCR, and Sanger sequencing were applied to the LEF1 gene. Also, we performed a mutational analysis for identified SNPs using bioinformatics tools. ResultsA positive CD5 & CD19 expression was found in B-CLL patients. No mutation was observed in exon two. While four mutations were observed in exon three; two of them were not reported in previous studies. Interestingly, splicing analysis predicted that these mutations could lead to splicing defects in LEF1 pre-mRNA due to their potential effects on splicing regulatory elements (i.e. ESE). Conclusionthe two mutations Pro134Pro and Ile135Asn (novel mutation) were detected in all enrolled CLL patients and they could be used as diagnostic and/or prognostic markers for CLL. Therefore, further in vitro and in vivo functional studies with a large sample size are required to verify the splicing effect of the detected mutations in LEF1 pre-mRNA.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Biology Reports
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.0%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.7%
3
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
4
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.3%
5
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.4%
7
Gene Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
8
Biomedicines
67 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.8%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 38%
2.8%
10
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
11
Gene
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.5%
12
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
14
F1000Research
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
16
Genomics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
17
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
18
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
102 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
19
Journal of Medical Virology
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
20
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
30 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
23
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
24
Cell & Bioscience
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
25
BioTechniques
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
26
Immunogenetics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
27
BMC Genomic Data
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%