MIADE metadata guidelines: Minimum Information About a Disorder Experiment
Meszaros, B.; Hatos, A.; Palopoli, N.; Quaglia, F.; Salladini, E.; Van Roey, K.; Arthanari, H.; Dosztanyi, Z.; Felli, I. C.; Fischer, P. D.; Hoch, J.; Jeffries, C. M.; Longhi, S.; Maiani, E.; Orchard, S.; Pancsa, R.; Papaleo, E.; Pierattelli, R.; Pritisanac, I.; Viennet, T.; Tompa, P.; Vranken, W.; Tosatto, S. C.; Davey, N. E.
Show abstract
An unambiguous description of an experimental setup and analysis, and the subsequent biological observation is vital for accurate data interpretation and reproducible results. Consequently, experimental analyses should be described in a concise, unequivocal, and digestible manner. The aim of minimum information guidelines is to define the fundamental complement of data that can support an unambiguous conclusion on experimental observations. In this document, we present the Minimum Information About Disorder Experiments (MIADE) guidelines to define the minimal fundamental parameters required for non-experts to understand the key findings of an experiment studying intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) or intrinsically disordered protein regions (IDRs). MIADE guidelines provide recommendations for data producers to describe the results of their experiments at source, for curators to annotate experimental data to community resources and for database developers maintaining community resources to disseminate the data. We give examples of the application of these guidelines in common use cases and describe the implementation of an update to the DisProt IDP database to allow MIADE-compliant annotation. The MIADE guidelines will improve the interpretability of experimental results for data consumers, facilitate direct data submission, simplify data curation, improve data exchange among repositories and standardise the dissemination of the key metadata on an IDP experiment by IDP data sources.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Navigating the Unstructured by Evaluating AlphaFold's Efficacy in Predicting Missing Residues and Structural Disorder in Proteins 94%
- Using AlphaFold to predict the impact of single mutations on protein stability and function 93%
- Difference contact maps: from what to why in the analysis of the conformational flexibility of proteins 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- NRPreTo: A Machine Learning Based Nuclear Receptor and Subfamily Prediction Tool 93%
- Experimental characterization of in silico red-shift predicted iLOVL470T/Q489K and iLOVV392K/F410V/A426S mutants 91%
- Predictive Models and Impact of Interfacial Contacts and Amino Acids on Protein-protein Binding Affinity 91%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.