Back

Application of ARIMA, hybrid ARIMA and Artificial Neural Network Models in predicting and forecasting tuberculosis incidences among children in Homa Bay and Turkana Counties, Kenya

Siamba, S.; Argwings, O.; Julius, K.

2022-07-10 infectious diseases
10.1101/2022.07.07.22277378 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundTuberculosis (TB) infections among children (below 15 years) is a growing concern, particularly in resource-limited settings. However, the TB burden among children is relatively unknown in Kenya where two-thirds of estimated TB cases are undiagnosed annually. Very few studies have used Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA), hybrid ARIMA, and Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) models to model infectious diseases globally. We applied ARIMA, hybrid ARIMA, and Artificial Neural Network models to predict and forecast TB incidences among children in Homa bay and Turkana Counties in Kenya. MethodsThe ARIMA, ANN, and hybrid models were used to predict and forecast monthly TB cases reported in the Treatment Information from Basic Unit (TIBU) system for Homa bay and Turkana Counties between 2012 and 2021. The data were split into training data, for model development, and testing data, for model validation using an 80:20 split ratio respectively. ResultsThe hybrid ARIMA model (ARIMA-ANN) produced better predictive and forecast accuracy compared to the ARIMA (0,0,1,1,0,1,12) and NNAR (1,1,2) [12] models. Furthermore, using the Diebold-Mariano (DM) test, the predictive accuracy of NNAR (1,1,2) [12] versus ARIMA-ANN, and ARIMA-ANN versus ARIMA (0,0,1,1,0,1,12) models were significantly different, p<0.001, respectively. The 12-month forecasts showed a TB prevalence of 175 to 198 cases per 100,000 children in Homa bay and Turkana Counties in 2022. ConclusionThe hybrid (ARIMA-ANN) model produces better predictive and forecast accuracy compared to the single ARIMA and ANN models. The findings show evidence that the prevalence of TB among children below 15 years in Homa bay and Turkana Counties is significantly under-reported and is potentially higher than the national average.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.6%
2
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.7%
3
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
10.1%
4
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.4%
5
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.6%
7
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
8
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
9
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
10
Infectious Disease Modelling
50 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
11
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
12
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
13
Tropical Medicine & International Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
14
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
15
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
16
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
17
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
18
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
19
Journal of Infection and Public Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
20
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
21
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
22
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
23
Infectious Diseases of Poverty
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
24
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
25
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%