The clinical utility and epidemiological impact of self-testing for SARS-CoV-2 using an-tigen detecting diagnostics: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Bruemmer, L. E.; Erdmann, C.; Tolle, H.; McGrath, S.; Olaru, I. D.; Katzenschlager, S.; Yerlikaya, S.; Grilli, M.; Pollock, N. R.; Erkosar, B.; Mace, A.; Ongarello, S.; Johnson, C. C.; Sacks, J. A.; Denkinger, C. M.
Show abstract
IntroductionSelf-testing for COVID-19 (C19ST) based on antigen detecting diagnostics could significantly support controlling the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. To inform the World Health Organization in developing a C19ST guideline, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available literature. MethodsWe electronically searched Medline and the Web of Science core collection, performed secondary reference screening, and contacted experts for further relevant publications. Any study published between December 1, 2020 and November 30, 2021 assessing the epidemiological impact and clinical utility of C19ST was included. Study quality was evaluated using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS). The review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022299977). Results11 studies only from high-income countries with an overall low quality (median of 3/9 stars on the NOS) were found. Pooled C19ST positivity was 0.2% (95% CI 0.1% to 0.4%; eight data sets) in populations where otherwise no dedicated testing would have occurred. The impact of self-testing on virus transmission was uncertain. Positive test results mainly resulted in people having to isolate without further confirmation of results (eight data sets). When testing was voluntary by study design, pooled testing uptake was 53.2% (95% CI 36.7% to 68.9%; five data sets. Outside direct health impacts, C19ST reduced quarantine duration and absenteeism from work, and made study participants feel safer. Study participants favored self-testing and were confident that they performed testing and sampling correctly. ConclusionsThe present data suggests that C19ST could be a valuable tool in reducing the spread of COVID-19, as it can achieve good uptake, may identify additional cases, and was generally perceived as positive by study participants. However, data was very limited and heterogenous, and further research especially in low- and middle-income countries is needed to assess the clinical utility and epidemiological impact of C19ST in more detail. CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE LITERATURE- COVID-19 self-testing (C19ST) using antigen detection could conceivably support pandemic control. A current PubMed search found no systematic evidence synthesis of studies assessing the epidemiological impact and clinical utility of C19ST implementation - We systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed 11 studies including more than 1.1 million persons tested - C19ST can achieve good uptake, may identify additional cases, and was general perceived as positive by study participants, suggesting it to be a valuable tool in reducing the spread of SARS-CoV-2 - Further data especially from low- and middle-income countries is needed to understand the impact of C19ST in more detail
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Occurrence and transmission potential of asymptomatic and presymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections: update of a living systematic review and meta-analysis 95%
- Accuracy of rapid point-of-care antigen-based diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis with meta regression analyzing influencing factors 95%
- The accuracy of novel antigen rapid diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2: a living systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Single-dose mRNA vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2, including P.1 and B.1.1.7 variants: a test-negative design in adults 70 years and older in British Columbia, Canada 94%
- Rapidly increasing SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and limited clinical disease in three Malian communities: a prospective cohort study 93%
- High household transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in the United States: living density, viral load, and disproportionate impact on communities of color 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infections with cumulative and imputed COVID-19 cases: systematic review 96%
- A prospective diagnostic evaluation of accuracy of self-taken and healthcare worker-taken swabs for rapid COVID-19 testing 94%
- Population risk factors for severe disease and mortality in COVID-19: A global systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Meta-Analysis of Robustness of COVID-19 Diagnostic Kits During Early Pandemic 93%
- A rapid systematic review of measures to protect older people in long term care facilities from COVID-19 93%
- First and second SARS-CoV-2 waves in inner London: A comparison of admission characteristics and the impact of the B.1.1.7 variant 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.