Back

Differential SARS-COV-2 Antigen Specificity Of The Humoral Response In Inactivated Virus-Vaccinated, Convalescent, And Breakthrough Subjects

Duarte, L. F.; Vasquez, Y.; Diethelm-Varela, B.; Pavez, V.; Berrios-Rojas, R.; White, J. A.; Kalergis, A. M.; Bueno, S. M.; Gonzalez, P. A.

2022-07-02 infectious diseases
10.1101/2022.07.01.22277165 medRxiv
Show abstract

Analytical methods for the differential determination between natural infection with SARS- CoV-2 vs. immunity elicited by vaccination or infection after immunization (breakthrough cases) represent attractive new research venues in the context of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Herein, we set out to compare humoral responses against several SARS-CoV-2 structural and non-structural proteins in infected unvaccinated (convalescent), vaccinated, as well as vaccinated and infected (breakthrough) individuals. Our results indicate that immunization with an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac) induces significantly higher levels of IgG antibodies against the membrane (M) protein of SARS-CoV-2 as compared to convalescent subjects both, after the primary vaccination schedule and after a booster dose. Moreover, we found that CoronaVac-immunized individuals, after receiving a third vaccine shot, display equivalent levels of N-specific IgG antibodies as convalescents subjects. Regarding non-structural viral proteins, for the two viral proteins ORF3a and NSP8, IgG antibodies were produced in more than 50% of the convalescent subjects. Finally, a logistic regression model and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis show that combined detection of M and N proteins may be useful as a biomarker to differentiate breakthrough cases from vaccinated and convalescent individuals that did not receive prior vaccination. Taken together, these results suggest that multiple SARS-CoV-2 antigens may be used as differential biomarkers for distinguishing natural infection from vaccination.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.