Angular speed should be avoided when assessing the speed-curvature power law of movement
Matic, A.; Gomez-Marin, A.
Show abstract
The speed-curvature power law is one of the most studied constraints in biological movement. In many types of movements, there is a strong relationship between instantaneous speed and local curvature. For example, in elliptical trajectories, tangential speed is proportional to curvature raised to the power -1/3, (V[~]C-1/3). This phenomenon is known as the "one-thirds power law" and is generally considered to be mathematically equivalent to the "two-thirds power law" that describes the relationship between angular speed and curvature (A[~]C2/3); the two formulations are used interchangeably. However, in this paper, analysis of empirical and synthetic data demonstrates that using angular speed instead of tangential speed to estimate the power law tends to result in much stronger correlations, impacting the interpretation of the strength of the relationship, and therefore the existence of the law. Further analysis shows that angular speed and curvature are often trivially correlated, since angular speed is not a purely kinematic variable and depends on curvature. In conclusion, two forms of the law are not equivalent, angular speed should be avoided when expressing the speed-curvature power law.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating the time structure of descending activation that generates movements at different speeds 95%
- Estimating descending activation patterns from EMG in fast and slow movements using a model of the stretch reflex 93%
- Reaching around obstacles accounts for uncertainty in coordinate transformations 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prediction and final temporal errors are used for trial-to-trial motor corrections 95%
- Earth-Gravity Congruent Motion Benefits Visual Gain For Parabolic Trajectories 93%
- Temporal and spatiotemporal perturbations in paced finger tapping point to a common mechanism for the processing of time errors 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.