Back

The Math of Margins: A Fresh Look at Bread Loaf Sections, Unchallenged Assumptions, and Citogenesis

Warne, M. M.; Klawonn, M. M.; Brodell, R. T.

2022-06-27 dermatology
10.1101/2022.06.25.22276453 medRxiv
Show abstract

Although there are many possible ways to treat skin cancer, most skin cancers are effectively treated by complete excision followed by standard histologic evaluation to ensure clear margins. The bread loaf technique describes a common method of processing specimens in which multiple slices of tissue are taken perpendicular to the major axis of an excision and submitted for microscopic analysis. Although sections may only be approximately four microns thick (0.000004 meters), this method is associated with high cure rates for basal cell and squamous cell carcinoma. Some authors have stated that this technique assesses less than 1% of the margins. We critically reviewed this assumption. While we confirm that the bread loaf technique often directly visualizes 1% or less of the peripheral and deep margins when considering only the width of sections compared to the entire length of an excisional specimen of the excision, much useful additional information is gained as soon as clear sections are identified towards the tips of a typical excisional specimen. For tumors that tend to grow in a nodular or spherical arrangement such as nodular basal cell carcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of keratoacanthomatous type, we show that a variable but significant portion of the margin may be considered sampled by proxy when slice faces are clear. We highlight the importance of understanding the principles involved in tissue sectioning in order to allow clinicians to make informed decisions on behalf of patients.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Experimental Dermatology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.1%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 8%
19.2%
3
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.5%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 22%
5.0%
6
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
7
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
8
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.4%
9
Journal of Investigative Dermatology
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
10
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
12
Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
14
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
15
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
16
Translational Vision Science & Technology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
17
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
18
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
Experimental Eye Research
30 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
20
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
21
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.7%
23
The Journal of Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%