Compliant citizens, defiant rebels or neither? Exploring changing COVID-19 vaccine attitudes and decisions in Bradford, UK: Findings from a follow-up qualitative study
Lockyer, B.; Moss, R. H.; Endacott, C.; Islam, S.; Sheard, L.; Bradford Institute for Health Research Covid-19 Scientific Advisory Group,
Show abstract
BackgroundCOVID-19 vaccines have been the central pillar of the public health response to the pandemic, intended to enable us to live with Covid. It is important to understand COVID-19 vaccines attitudes and decisions in order to maximise uptake through an empathetic lens. ObjectiveTo explore the factors that influenced peoples COVID-19 vaccines decisions and how attitudes towards the vaccines had changed in an eventful year. Design and participantsThis is a follow up study that took place in Bradford, UK one year after the original study, between October 2021 and January 2022. In-depth phone interviews were conducted with 12 (of the 20 originally interviewed) people from different ethnic groups and areas of Bradford. Reflexive thematic analysis was conducted. Results11 of the 12 participants interviewed had received both doses of the COVID-19 vaccine and most intended to have a booster dose. Participants described a variety of reasons why they had decided to have the vaccines, including: feeling at increased risk at work; protecting family and others in their communities, unrestricted travel and being influenced by the vaccine decisions of family, friends and colleagues. All participants discussed ongoing interaction with COVID-19 misinformation and for some this meant they were uneasy about their decision to have the vaccine. They described feeling overloaded by and disengaged from COVID-19 information, which they often found contradictory and some felt mistrustful of the UK governments motives and decisions during the pandemic. ConclusionsThe majority of participants had managed to navigate an overwhelming amount of circulating COVID-19 misinformation and chosen to have two or more COVID-19 vaccines, even if they had been previously said they were unsure. However, these decisions were complicated, and demonstrate the continuum of vaccine hesitancy and acceptance. This follow up study underlines that vaccine attitudes are changeable and contextual. Patient or Public ContributionThe original study was developed through a rapid community and stakeholder engagement process in 2020. Discussion with the Bradford Council Public Health team and the public through the Bradford COVID-19 Community Insights Group was undertaken in 2021 to identify important priorities for this follow up study.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring Vaccine Hesitancy in Care Home Employees in North West England: A Qualitative Study 97%
- Attitudes towards vaccines and intention to vaccinate against COVID-19: Implications for public health communications in Australia 96%
- “ We don’t routinely check vaccination background in adults” : A national qualitative study of barriers and facilitators to vaccine delivery and uptake in adult migrants through UK primary care 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Vaccine Confidence and Hesitancy at the start of COVID-19 vaccine deployment in the UK: An embedded mixed-methods study 98%
- COVID-19 Vaccine Perceptions And Differences By Sex, Age, And Education: Findings From A Cross-Sectional Assessment Of 1367 Community Adults In Ontario 95%
- Health Belief, Planned Behavior, or Psychological Antecedents: What predicts COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy better among the Bangladeshi Adults? 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Public attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination in children: A qualitative study 98%
- Understanding and Addressing Vaccine Hesitancy in the Context of COVID-19: Development of a Digital intervention 97%
- COVID-19 vaccination acceptability in the UK at the start of the vaccination programme: a nationally representative cross-sectional survey (CoVAccS – wave 2) 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 vaccination beliefs, attitudes, and behaviours among health and social care workers in the UK: a mixed-methods study 98%
- COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and refusal and associated factors in an adult population in Saskatchewan, Canada: Evidence from predictive modelling 96%
- COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy among Marginalized Populations in the U.S. and Canada: Protocol for a Scoping Review 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- A “step too far” or “perfect sense”? A qualitative study of British adults’ views on mandating COVID-19 vaccination and vaccine passports 98%
- Localising Vaccination Services: Qualitative Insights on an Orthodox Jewish Collaboration with Public health during the UK coronavirus Vaccine Programme 97%
- The social experience of participation in a COVID-19 vaccine trial: Subjects’ motivations, others’ concerns, and insights for vaccine promotion 97%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.