Deep-learning-based automatic detection of pulmonary nodules from chest radiographs
Ajmera, P.; Pant, R.; Seth, J.; Ghuwalewala, S.; Kulkarni, V.; Duddalwar, V.; Kharat, A.; Kulkarni, V.; Patil, P.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo assess a deep learning-based artificial intelligence model for the detection of pulmonary nodules on chest radiographs and to compare its performance with board-certified human readers. MethodsFor this retrospective study, 308 chest radiographs were obtained between January 2019 to December 2021 from a tertiary care hospital. All radiographs were analyzed using a deep learning AI model called DxNodule AI Screen. Two expert board-certified radiologists established the ground truth, and 11 test readers independently reviewed all radiographs in two sessions (unaided and AI-aided mode) with a washout period of one month. ResultsThe standalone model had an AUROC of 0.905 [0.87, 0.94] in detecting pulmonary nodules. The mean AUROC across the 11 readers improved from 0.798 [0.74, 0.86] for unaided interpretation to 0.846 [0.82, 0.880] for AI-aided interpretation. With DxNodule AI Screen, readers were able to identify nodules at the correct locations, which they otherwise missed. The mean specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV of the readers improved significantly from 0.87 [0.78, 0.96], 0.78 [0.72, 0.84], 0.77 [0.65, 0.88], and 0.86 [0.81, 0.90] in the unaided session to 0.89 [0.82, 0.96], 0.83 [0.80, 0.85], 0.82 [0.73, 0.9], and 0.89 [0.86, 0.92], respectively in the aided session. ConclusionDxNodule AI Screen outperformed human readers in nodule detection performance on chest radiographs, and enhanced human readers performances when used as an aid.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Auto-detection of motion artifacts on CT pulmonary angiograms with a physician-trained AI algorithm 96%
- Passive Microwave Radiometry (MWR) for diagnostics of COVID-19 lung complications in Kyrgyzstan 94%
- Volumetric lung cancer screening reduces unnecessary low-dose computed tomography scans: results from a single-centre prospective trial on 4,119 subjects 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- High-Dimensional Multinomial Multiclass Severity Scoring of COVID-19 Pneumonia Using CT Radiomics Features and Machine Learning Algorithms 95%
- Content-based image retrieval assists radiologists in diagnosing eye and orbital mass lesions in MRI 95%
- Toward Understanding COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Deep-learning-based Approach for Severity Analysis and Monitoring the Disease 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantitative analysis of chest computed tomography of COVID-19 pneumonia using a software widely used in Japan 96%
- Accuracy of deep learning based computed tomography diagnostic system of COVID-19: a consecutive sampling external validation cohort study 95%
- Enhancing Semantic Segmentation in Chest X-Ray Images through Image Preprocessing: ps-KDE for Pixel-wise Substitution by Kernel Density Estimation 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Designing a computer-assisted diagnosis system for cardiomegaly detection and radiology report generation 95%
- A Comparison of CXR-CAD Software to Radiologists in Identifying COVID-19 in Individuals Evaluated for Sars CoV 2 Infection in Malawi and Zambia 94%
- Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model for Detecting Signs of Tuberculosis on Chest Radiographs among US-bound Immigrants and Refugees 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.