Back

Genomic epidemiology of circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants during first two years of the pandemic in Colombia

Jimenez Silva, C. L.; Rivero, R.; Douglas, J.; Bouckaert, R.; Villabona Arenas, C. J.; Atkins, K.; Gastelbondo, B.; Calderon, A.; Guzman, C.; Echeverri-De la Hoz, D.; Munoz, M.; Ballesteros, N.; Castaneda, S.; Patino, L. H.; Ramirez, A.; Luna, N.; Paniz Mondolfi, A.; Serrano-Coll, H.; Ramirez, J. D.; Mattar, S.; Drummond, A.

2022-06-21 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2022.06.20.22275744 medRxiv
Show abstract

The emergence of highly transmissible SARS-CoV-2 variants has led to surges in cases and the need for global genomic surveillance. While some variants rapidly spread worldwide, other variants only persist nationally. There is a need for more fine-scale analysis to understand transmission dynamics at a country scale. For instance, the Mu variant of interest, also known as lineage B.1.621, was first detected in Colombia and was responsible for a large local wave but only a few sporadic cases elsewhere. To provide a better understanding of the epidemiology of SARS-Cov-2 variants in Colombia, we used 14,049 complete SARS-CoV-2 genomes from the 32 states of Colombia, and performed Bayesian phylodynamic analyses to estimate the time of variants introduction, their respective effective reproductive number, and effective population size, and the impact of disease control measures. We detected a total of 188 SARS-CoV-2 Pango lineages circulating in Colombia since the start of the pandemic. We showed that the effective reproduction number oscillated drastically throughout the first two years of the pandemic, with Mu showing the highest transmissibility (Re and growth rate estimation). Our results reinforce that genomic surveillance programs are essential for countries to make evidence-driven interventions towards the emergence and circulation of novel SARS-CoV-2 variants.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.