Back

Detecting CTP Truncation Artifacts in Acute Stroke Imaging from the Arterial Input and the Vascular Output Functions

de la Rosa, E.; Sima, D. M.; Kirschke, J. S.; Menze, B. H.; Robben, D.

2022-06-21 neurology
10.1101/2022.06.16.22276371
Show abstract

BackgroundCurrent guidelines for CT perfusion (CTP) in acute stroke suggest acquiring scans with a minimal duration of 60-70 s. But even then, CTP analysis can be affected by truncation artifacts. Conversely, shorter acquisitions are still widely used in clinical practice and are usually sufficient to reliably estimate lesion volumes. We aim to devise an automatic method that detects scans affected by truncation artifacts. MethodsShorter scan durations are simulated from the ISLES18 dataset by consecutively removing the last CTP time-point until reaching a 10 s duration. For each truncated series, perfusion lesion volumes are quantified and used to label the series as unreliable if the lesion volumes considerably deviate from the original untruncated ones. Afterwards, nine features from the arterial input function (AIF) and the vascular output function (VOF) are derived and used to fit machine-learning models with the goal of detecting unreliably truncated scans. Methods are compared against a baseline classifier solely based on the scan duration, which is the current clinical standard. The ROC-AUC, precision-recall AUC and the F1-score are measured in a 5-fold cross-validation setting. ResultsMachine learning models obtained high performance, with a ROC-AUC of 0.964 and precision-recall AUC of 0.958 for the best performing classifier. The highest detection rate is obtained with support vector machines (F1-score = 0.913). The most important feature is the AIFcoverage, measured as the time difference between the scan duration and the AIF peak. In comparison, the baseline classifier yielded a lower performance of 0.940 ROC-AUC and 0.933 precision-recall AUC. At the 60-second cutoff, the baseline classifier obtained a low detection of unreliably truncated scans (F1-Score = 0.638). ConclusionsMachine learning models fed with discriminant AIF and VOF features accurately detected unreliable stroke lesion measurements due to insufficient acquisition duration. Unlike the 60s scan duration criterion, the devised models are robust to variable contrast injection and CTP acquisition protocols and could hence be used for quality assurance in CTP post-processing software.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Neurology
based on 74 papers
Top 1%
11.6%
2
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 11%
11.6%
3
IEEE Access
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
7.8%
4
npj Digital Medicine
based on 85 papers
Top 3%
7.8%
5
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 61%
6.6%
6
NeuroImage
based on 36 papers
Top 2%
2.9%
7
PLOS Digital Health
based on 88 papers
Top 6%
2.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
Scientific Data
based on 30 papers
Top 0.8%
2.5%
9
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
based on 36 papers
Top 4%
2.3%
10
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
based on 11 papers
Top 0.8%
1.9%
11
Sensors
based on 18 papers
Top 1%
1.8%
12
Human Brain Mapping
based on 53 papers
Top 4%
1.8%
13
NeuroImage: Clinical
based on 77 papers
Top 5%
1.6%
14
Computers in Biology and Medicine
based on 39 papers
Top 4%
1.6%
15
Stroke
based on 29 papers
Top 2%
1.6%
16
Communications Medicine
based on 63 papers
Top 1%
1.4%
17
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
based on 12 papers
Top 0.7%
1.4%
18
Heliyon
based on 57 papers
Top 8%
1.2%
19
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
1.2%
20
Journal of the American Heart Association
based on 92 papers
Top 10%
1.2%
21
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
based on 22 papers
Top 4%
0.8%
22
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
based on 12 papers
Top 1%
0.8%
23
BMC Neurology
based on 11 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
24
Brain Communications
based on 79 papers
Top 7%
0.7%
25
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
based on 18 papers
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
based on 11 papers
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Neurology
based on 38 papers
Top 7%
0.7%
28
Journal of Neural Engineering
based on 19 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
based on 10 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
based on 33 papers
Top 6%
0.7%