Predicting seasonal influenza vaccine response using systemic gene expression profiling
GRESHAM, D.; Forst, C. V.; Chung, M.; Hockman, M.; Lashua, L.; Adney, E.; Carlock, M. A.; Ross, T.; Ghedin, E.
Show abstract
Seasonal influenza is a primary public health burden in the USA and globally. Annual vaccination programs are designed on the basis of circulating influenza viral strains. However, the effectiveness of the seasonal influenza vaccine is highly variable between seasons and among individuals. A number of factors are known to influence vaccination effectiveness including age, sex, and comorbidities. Here, we sought to determine whether whole blood gene expression profiling prior to vaccination is informative about pre-existing immunological status and the immunological response to vaccine. We performed whole transcriptome analysis using RNA sequencing (RNAseq) of whole blood samples obtained prior to vaccination from participants enrolled in an annual influenza vaccine trial. Serological status prior to vaccination and 28 days following vaccination was assessed using the hemagglutination inhibition assay (HAI) to define baseline immune status and the response to vaccination. We find evidence that genes with immunological functions are increased in expression in individuals with higher pre-existing immunity and in those individuals who mount a greater response to vaccination. Using a random forest model we find that this set of genes can be used to predict vaccine response with a performance similar to a model that incorporates physiological and prior vaccination status alone. Our study shows that increased expression of immunological genes, possibly reflecting greater plasmablast cell populations, prior to vaccination is associated with an enhanced response to vaccine. Furthermore, in the absence of physiological information and vaccination history, whole blood gene expression signatures are informative about the immunological response of an individual to seasonal influenza vaccination.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Microarray Gene Expression DatasetRe-Analysis Reveals Variability in InfluenzaInfection and Vaccination. 96%
- Long Non-Coding RNAs in Response to Ebola Virus Vaccine-Induced Immunity 95%
- Machine learning-based single cell and integrative analysis reveals that baseline mDC predisposition predicts protective Hepatitis B vaccine response 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- BNT162b2 induced neutralizing and non-neutralizing antibody functions against SARSCoV-2 diminish with age 95%
- Biological modifications of the immune response to COVID-19 vaccine in patients treated with rituximab and immune-checkpoint inhibitors 95%
- Robust immune response to the BNT162b mRNA vaccine in an elderly population vaccinated 15 months after recovery from COVID-19 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genome-Wide Asymptomatic B-Cell, CD4+ and CD8+ T-Cell Epitopes, that are Highly Conserved Between Human and Animal Coronaviruses, Identified from SARS-CoV-2 as Immune Targets for Pre-Emptive Pan-Coronavirus Vaccines 94%
- Seasonal Variability and Shared Molecular Signatures of Inactivated Influenza Vaccination in Young and Older Adults 93%
- Functional modulation of T follicular cells in vivo enhances antigen-specific humoral immunity 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Continuous population-level monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in a large metropolitan region 94%
- Genetic immune response and antibody repertoire of heterologous ChAdOx1-BNT162b2 vaccination in a Korean cohort 94%
- Functional and structural modifications of influenza antibodies during pregnancy 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Negligible impact of SARS-CoV-2 variants on CD4+ and CD8+ T cell reactivity in COVID-19 exposed donors and vaccinees. 94%
- Comprehensive analysis of T cell immunodominance and immunoprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 epitopes in COVID-19 cases 94%
- A SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Strategy Focused on Population-Scale Immunity 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.