Sensitivity of rapid antigen tests for COVID-19 during the Omicron variant outbreak
Murakami, M.; Sato, H.; Irie, T.; Kamo, M.; Naito, W.; Yasutaka, T.; Imoto, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundRapid antigen tests have been used to prevent the spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); however, there have been concerns about their decreased sensitivity to the Omicron variant. AimsIn this study, we compared the sensitivity and specificity of the rapid antigen and the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests among the players and staff members of the Japan Professional Football League and clubs. Furthermore, we evaluated the relationship between the sensitivity and the duration from the onset of the symptoms to testing, the manufacturer of the rapid antigen test kits, and the PCR test analyte. Design and methodsThis was a retrospective observational study. We used 656 results from both the rapid antigen and PCR tests for COVID-19 using the analytes collected on the same day from January 12 to March 2, 2022, during the Omicron variant outbreak in Japan. ResultsThe sensitivity of the rapid antigen test compared with the PCR test was 0.63 (95% confidence interval: 0.54-0.72) and the specificity was 0.998 (95% confidence interval: 0.995-1.000). There were no significant associations between the sensitivity and the duration from the onset of the symptoms to testing (including asymptomatic cases in the category), vaccination status, manufacturer of the rapid antigen test kit or PCR analyte (P > 0.05) with small effect sizes (Cramers V or {varphi}: [≤] 0.22). ConclusionsEven during the Omicron outbreak, the sensitivity of the rapid antigen tests did not depend on the duration from the onset of the symptoms to testing.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Diagnostic performance of a novel digital immunoassay (RapidTesta SARS-CoV-2): a prospective observational study with 1,127 nasopharyngeal samples 93%
- Dynamics of anti-Spike IgG antibody level after full BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccination in health care workers 93%
- The evaluation of a novel digital immunochromatographic assay with silver amplification to detect SARS-CoV-2 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Perception of yips among professional Japanese golfers: perspectives and challenges 92%
- Rapid Clinical Screening and Staging for COVID-19 Severe Outcome A Hospitalization Study in New York City 92%
- Are commercial antibody assays substantially underestimating SARS-CoV-2 ever infection? An analysis on a population-based sample in a high exposure setting 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Successful reboot of high-performance sporting activities by Japanese national women’s handball team in Tokyo, 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic: An initiative by Japan Sports-Cyber Physical System (JS-CPS) of Sports Research Innovation Project (SRIP) 96%
- SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among healthcare workers in general hospitals and clinics in Japan 94%
- Effects of wearing FFP2 masks on SARS-CoV-2 infection rates in classrooms 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of triage checklist for mild COVID-19 outpatients in predicting subsequent emergency department visits and hospitalization during isolation period 92%
- Upper limb functional recovery in chronic stroke patients after COVID-19-interrupted rehabilitation: An observational study 91%
- Rehabilitation with and without Robot and Allied Digital Technologies (RADTs) in stroke patients: a study protocol for a multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial on the effectiveness, acceptability, usability, and economic-organizational sustainability of RADTs from subacute to chronic phase (STROKEFIT4) 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.