Back

Pioglitazone for optimisation of clinical nutrition therapy in the critically ill patient: A Systematic Review

McClelland, T. J.; Fowler, A. J.; Davies, T.; Pearse, R.; Prowle, J. R.; puthucheary, z.

2022-06-08 nutrition
10.1101/2022.06.07.22276074 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSkeletal muscle wasting is a major determinant of physical functional disability in critical illness survivors, and contributes to post-intensive care syndrome. As yet, no therapies exist to address this major public health issue. Intramuscular bioenergetic failure and inflammation are understood to be the underpinning mechanisms, and carbohydrate and lipid oxidation are impaired. This systematic review synthesises the evidence that peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonists may be a therapeutic option to optimise clinical nutrition in critically ill patients. MethodSystematic review and meta-analysis. ResultsFourteen studies over 19 publications were included. Lean body mass was unaffected (n=174). Pioglitazone treatment resulted in periperal insulin sensitivity increasing 30-71% (Standardised mean change 0.97 (95%CI 0.36-1.58; n=213). Intramuscular Tumour Necrosis Factor Alpha concentrations decreased in treatement arms (n=29) as did circulating interlukin-6 and Tumour Necrosis Factor Alpha (n=53). Intramyocellular Lipid concentrations decreased by 34-40% with pioglitazone therapy (n=60). Treatment increased intramuscular markers of Oxidative Phosphorylation (n=55), mitochondrial biogenesis(PGC1 and PGC1{beta}; n=26) and {beta}-oxidation (n=29) ConclusionsPioglitazone therapy increases skeletal muscle insulin sensitivity, decreases intramyocellular lipid accumulation and systemic and intramuscular inflammation. Where lean body mass was measured, this was seen to increase. Pioglitazone may be an adjunctive therapy to optimise clinical nutrition in acutely unwell patients. Clinical relevancy statementPioglitazone may optimise clinical nutrition therapy in critically ill patients by normalising carbohydrate and lipid metabolism.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
2
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
3
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.4%
5
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.0%
6
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
5.0%
7
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
The Journal of Nutrition
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
9
Diabetologia
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
10
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 52%
2.0%
12
Frontiers in Nutrition
23 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
13
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
14
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
15
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
16
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
18
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
20
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
21
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
22
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
23
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
24
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
Appetite
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
26
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
27
GeroScience
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
30
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%