Measuring circadian rhythms in patients with dementia: protocol for a scoping review
Gabb, V. G.; Ince, L. M.; Rudd, S.; Coulthard, E.
Show abstract
IntroductionMost physiological processes are under circadian regulation. Disturbances to circadian rhythms are common and often early symptoms in dementia. There is a gap in the literature regarding how and which circadian functions have been, or could optimally be, measured in patients with dementia. This protocol outlines a scoping review to identify which and how circadian variables have been studied in patients with dementia and mild cognitive impairment, and examine whether feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, and utility in clinical practice has been considered. Methods and analysisThe scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews and will be reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). We will systematically search five electronic bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PsycInfo). There will be no restriction on date of publication or language; corresponding authors will be contacted where relevant non-English articles are identified to request a translation. Search results will be merged using reference management software and duplicates will be removed. To ensure consistency in applying eligibility criteria, 10% of retrieved articles will be checked by each reviewer in the team at the title and abstract screening stage and full texts will be reviewed by at least 2 reviewers. Data from eligible articles will be extracted using a standardised form. Where study outcomes (e.g., patient and public involvement, adherence) have not been described in the article, authors will be contacted in case relevant data is available to share but was omitted from the main report. Results will be presented as a narrative synthesis as study and population heterogeneity will likely prohibit meta-analysis. Ethics and disseminationEthical approval is not required as the scoping review methodology does not involve human or animal participants. This review will provide an extensive overview of established and emerging trends in measurement of circadian rhythms in dementia and identify gaps in the research to inform future clinical and research practice. The review will also highlight whether patient and public involvement, participant burden, and clinical usefulness of methods have been considered in developing protocols. Results will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed publication.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Healthy Brain Initiative (HBI): A prospective cohort study protocol 91%
- A Systematic Review of the Association between Sedentary Behavior and Non-Motor Symptoms of Parkinsons Disease 91%
- Cognition, physical function, and life purpose in the rural elderly population: a systematic review protocol 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Abnormal sleep blood pressure patterns are associated with diffusion tensor imaging along perivascular spaces index in cognitively impaired individuals 91%
- Detection of cognitive decline using a single-channel EEG with an interactive assessment tool 90%
- Everyday functioning in a community-based volunteer population: Differences between participant- and study partner-report 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Optimising activity and diet compositions for dementia prevention: Protocol for the ACTIVate prospective longitudinal cohort study 92%
- Memory for Music (M4M) protocol for an international randomized controlled trial: Effects of individual intensive musical training based on singing in non-musicians with Alzheimer's disease 91%
- The Effects of COgNitive Training in Community-dwelling Older Adults at High Risk for demENTia (CONTENT): study protocol of two double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A randomized sham-controlled trial of transcranial and intranasal photobiomodulation in Japanese patients with mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia due to Alzhimer’s disease: a protocol 90%
- Sleep, pain, and neurodegeneration: A Mendelian randomization study 89%
- Efficacy of a multiple-component and multifactorial personalized fall prevention program in community-dwelling older adults at moderate-to-high fall risk: The PRE.C.I.S.A. Randomized Controlled Trial 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.