Back

Designing a flow-controlled STA-MCA anastomosis based on the Hagen-Poiseuille law for preventing postoperative hyperperfusion in adult moyamoya disease

Zhang, J.; Fujimura, M.; Lau, T. Y.; Chen, J.

2022-06-06 surgery
10.1101/2022.06.04.22275816 medRxiv
Show abstract

OBJECTIVETechnical improvements for preventing postoperative symptomatic cerebral hyperperfusion (CHP) during superficial temporal artery-middle cerebral artery (STA-MCA) anastomosis for moyamoya disease (MMD) were seldom reported. The aim of this study was to investigate the significance of application of a novel flow-controlled concept which voluntarily reduces the hemodynamic difference between the donor and recipient arteries based on the Hagen-Poiseuille law when performing direct anastomoses of recipient parasylvian cortical arteries (PSCAs) with anterograde hemodynamic sources from the MCA (M-PSCAs) in adult MMD. METHODSRecently direct anastomoses of recipient M-PSCAs were performed on 89 symptomatic hemispheres in 82 adult MMD patients in our hospital. They were divided into the flow-controlled group and non-flow-controlled group. The patients basic characteristics and incidence of postoperative CHP were compared between the two groups. Risk factors for occurrence of postoperative CHP were analyzed. RESULTSThe earlier 36 and later 53 anastomoses were respectively included in the non-flow-controlled group and flow-controlled group. The incidences of postoperative focal (22.6%) and symptomatic CHP (5.7%) in the flow-controlled group were significantly lower than those (focal, 52.8%; symptomatic, 25.0%) in the non flow-controlled group (P = 0.003 and 0.009, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that the flow-controlled concept used or not was significantly associated with the development of focal (P = 0.005) and symptomatic (P = 0.012) CHP. CONCLUSIONSThe flow-controlled STA-MCA anastomosis can significantly decrease the incidence of postoperative CHP during direct anastomoses of recipient M-PSCAs in adult MMD.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.