Bridging the gap: A qualitative analysis of online public forum with healthcare professionals in bursting myths about weight management.
Bhatti, R.; Joumaa, M.; Bereczky, B.
Show abstract
BackgroundObesity has increased rapidly worldwide in last few decades. According to World Obesity Federation 2018, the prevalence of obesity in UAE amongst Emirati aged 18-69 years has been reported as 32.2% vs 38.5% living with obesity vs overweight in men and 41.8% vs 29.3% living with obesity vs overweight in women. There are many myths amongst general public about obesity. AimThe objective of the study was to address public questions through online forum regarding weight management. MethodsIn this cross-sectional observational study qualitative analysis was done. It was conducted quarterly at Mediclinic City and Parkview Hospital in Dubai from August 2020-September 2021. An online zoom meeting was made available to the public. People who wanted to attend the session registered via dedicated email address. A certified dietician, endocrinologist and bariatric surgeon were available to answer peoples questions. Results6 online forums have been conducted. 163 (range 10-90) people attended. Three themes were constructed during data analysis. 1-Diet: whats the best diet and about caloric intake. 2-Insulin resistance or hormone imbalance is responsible for weight gain. 3-Misinformation and unrealistic expectations about bariatric surgery. Feedback from audience was it was interactive, fun and informative session, its good to know that its not my fault and I need to get help. ConclusionOur results show that patients need support throughout their weight management journey. Healthcare professionals need to be more aware of patients perceptions about weight management so that they can be addressed in consultations. We need more online support sessions facilitated by healthcare professionals.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Weight-normative messaging predominates on TikTok – a qualitative content analysis 96%
- A feasibility study to test a novel approach to dietary weight loss with a focus on assisting informed decision making in food selection 96%
- Strategies to Reduce Hyperglycemia-Related Anxiety in Elite Athletes with Type 1 Diabetes: A Qualitative Analysis 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Protocol for a prospective cohort study on the feasibility of application of nutritional ultrasound in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with nutritional risk at hospital discharge: Study on body composition and function (DRECO) 94%
- Prevalence Of Abdominal Obesity And Its Association With Cardiovascular Risk Among The Adult Population In Burkina Faso 94%
- Protocol for a prospective cohort study for the assessment of sarcopenia in gestational diabetes: The SiGnal-D study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impostor Phenomenon in the Nutrition and Dietetics Profession: An Online Cross-Sectional Survey 95%
- Gynaecological health patterns and motherhood experiences of female professional football players 94%
- Prevalence of Mental Health Disorders among Elderly Diabetics and Associated Risk Factors in Indonesia 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using the Mercy Method to Estimate Ideal Body Weight in Children. A Description and Validation of a New Methodology 93%
- “One more tool in the tool belt”: A qualitative interview study investigating patient and clinician opinions on the integration of psychometrics into routine testing for disorders of gut-brain interaction 92%
- Safety and efficacy of long-acting insulins (degludec and glargine) among type 2 diabetic Asian Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of bariatric surgery on monthly earnings and employment: a national linked data study in England, 2014-2022 91%
- Characteristics and outcomes of 627 044 COVID-19 patients with and without obesity in the United States, Spain, and the United Kingdom 90%
- Obesity, walking pace and risk of severe COVID-19: Analysis of UK Biobank 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.