Back

Effect of the INSR gene variants on the long-term response to a 31-month childhood obesity intervention

Chen, J.; Shan, R.; Xiao, W.-C.; Liu, Z.

2022-05-26 public and global health
10.1101/2022.05.26.22275619 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo explore effects of the INSR genotype on the waist circumference reduction after a lifestyle-based obesity intervention. MethodsThis was a nested study in a cluster-randomized controlled trial conducted from September 2018 to June 2019 in Beijing, China. Four schools (200 children) were randomized to the intervention group (diet and physical activity) and 4 schools (193 children) were randomized to the control group (usual practice without a focus on obesity prevention). We followed up children at 9 months (the end of the intervention) and 31 months (22 months after the intervention), and genotyped 7 independent SNPs in the INSR gene. We assessed genetic effects on changes in five waist-related indicators [waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio (whr), waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), waist circumference adjusted by BMI (WCadjBMI), waist-to-hip ratio adjusted by BMI (WHRadjBMI)] from baseline to 9 months and from 9 months to 31 months in the intervention and control group, respectively, and compared whether genetic effects differed by group (i.e., gene-group interaction). ResultsFrom baseline to 9 months, we found that INSR rs7508679, rs10420008, rs11883325, and rs4804416 modified the intervention effects on changes in all waist-related indicators (all P < 0.05). In the control group, the effect allele was associated with greater increases in waist-related indicators, whereas opposite-directional associations were observed in the intervention group. Such interactions between SNPs and group assignment were almost not observed from 9 months to 31 months. ConclusionOur data suggested that children carrying effect alleles of rs7508679, rs10420008, rs11883325, or rs4804416 may benefit more from a lifestyle intervention for obesity prevention, but the effect appeared to be attenuated in the long term.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.