Back

Modelling the impacts of public health interventions and weather on SARS-CoV-2 Omicron outbreak in Hong Kong

Yuan, H.-Y.; LIANG, J.

2022-05-26 public and global health
10.1101/2022.05.25.22275487 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundHong Kong, has operated under a zero-Covid policy in the past few years. As a result, population immunity from natural infections has been low. The fifth wave in Hong Kong, caused by the Omicron variant, grew substantially in February 2022 during the transition from winter into spring. The daily number of reported cases began to decline quickly in a few days after social distancing regulations were tightened and rapid antigen test (RAT) kits were largely distributed. How the non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) and seasonal factors (temperature and relative humidity) could affect the spread of Omicron remains unknown. MethodsWe developed a model with stratified immunity, to incorporate antibody responses, together with changes in mobility and seasonal factors. After taking into account the detection rates of PCR test and RAT, we fitted the model to the daily number of reported cases between 1 February and 31 March, and quantified the associated effects of individual NPIs and seasonal factors on infection dynamics. FindingsAlthough NPIs and vaccine boosters were critical in reducing the number of infections, temperature was associated with a larger change in transmissibility. Cold days appeared to drive Re from about 2-3 sharply to 10.6 (95%CI: 9.9-11.4). But this number reduced quickly below one a week later when the temperature got warmer. The model projected that if weather in March maintained as Februarys average level, the estimated cumulative incidence could increase double to about 80% of total population. InterpretationTemperature should be taken into account when making public health decisions (e.g. a more relaxed (or tightened) social distancing during a warmer (or colder) season).

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.5%
2
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.3%
3
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
4
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.3%
5
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
6
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.8%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.8%
9
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.5%
10
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
11
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.0%
13
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
14
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
15
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
18
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
19
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
20
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
21
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
22
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 54%
0.9%
24
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.7%
25
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
26
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 75%
0.7%
28
Infectious Diseases of Poverty
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
29
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%