Back

Parents' intention to vaccinate their child for COVID-19: a cross-sectional survey (CoVAccS - wave 3)

Smith, L. E.; Sherman, S. M.; Sim, J.; Amlot, R.; Cutts, M.; Dasch, H.; Sevdalis, N.; Rubin, G. J.

2022-05-20 public and global health
10.1101/2022.05.20.22275350 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesTo investigate UK parents vaccination intention at a time when COVID-19 vaccination was available to some children. Study designData reported are from the second wave of a prospective cohort study. MethodsOnline survey of 270 UK parents (conducted 4-15 October 2021). At this time, vaccination was available to 16- and 17-year-olds and had become available to 12- to 15- year-olds two weeks prior. We asked participants whose child had not yet been vaccinated how likely they were to vaccinate their child for COVID-19. Linear regression analyses were used to investigate factors associated with intention. Parents were also asked for their main reasons behind vaccination intention. Open-ended responses were analysed using content analysis. ResultsParental vaccination intention was mixed (likely: 39.3%, 95% CI 32.8%, 45.7%; uncertain: 33.9%, 27.7%, 40.2%; unlikely: 26.8%, 20.9%, 32.6%). Intention was associated with: parental COVID-19 vaccination status; greater perceived necessity and social norms regarding COVID-19 vaccination; greater COVID-19 threat appraisal; and lower vaccine safety and novelty concerns. In those who intended to vaccinate their child, the main reasons for doing so were to protect the child and others. In those who did not intend to vaccinate their child, the main reason was safety concerns. ConclusionsParent COVID-19 vaccination and psychological factors explained a large percentage of the variance in vaccination intention for ones child. How fluctuating infection rates, more children being vaccinated, and the UKs reliance on vaccination as a strategy to live with COVID-19 may impact parents intention to vaccinate their child requires further study.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.