Analysis of the All of Us Research Program Researcher Workbench Workspaces
Kerawala, R.; Mayo, K. R.; King, P. F.; Vogel, J. M.; The All of Us Research Program,
Show abstract
The All of Us Research Program, through the All of Us Research Hub platforms Researcher Workbench, provides researchers and citizen scientists with access to a broad dataset of surveys, electronic health records, physical measurements, genetic data, and Fitbit device wearable data. All of Us has a goal of recruiting a minimum of one million participants and aims to capture the diversity of individuals in the United States. The All of Us Research Hub platform includes a Research Projects Directory on its website, displaying researcher-provided descriptions of each active workspace on the Researcher Workbench. Inspired by the initial work completed by All of Us investigators in 2019, these workspace descriptions were analyzed with a new methodology. Genetic, methods and validation studies, and educational research purposes were associated with disease-focused research, as compared to non-disease focused research. Of all the population categories of interest, only race and ethnicity were associated with disease-focused research. Further categorization of the disease-focused workspaces revealed the top five disease categories: cardiovascular disease, brain and mental health disorders, cancer and benign tumors, diabetes, and immunology-related conditions. Athena OHDSI catalog terms were sorted and helped classify the workspaces by each disease category. Subcategory distribution for the cancer, genetic, and cardiovascular disease-related conditions was examined as well. This framework has the potential to be used for continued longitudinal analysis of the workspaces and continued learnings regarding the importance of disease-focused research in public health. Additionally, as workspace descriptions are created at project initiation, this can provide us with a leading-edge indication of researcher interest in the All of Us Research Program data.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The potential for digital patient symptom recording through symptom assessment applications to optimize patient flow and reduce waiting times in Urgent Care Centers: a simulation study 92%
- Is virtual care the new normal? Evidence supporting Covid-19’s durable transformation on healthcare delivery 92%
- The Validity of the Parsley Symptom Index: an e-PROM designed for Telehealth 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Scientific hypothesis generation process in clinical research: a secondary data analytic tool versus experience study protocol 94%
- Strategies and Tools for electronic health records and physician workflow alignment: A scoping review protocol 93%
- Exposure to and engagement with digital psychoeducational content and community related to maternal mental health by perinatal persons and mothers: design of an online survey with optional follow-up and participant characteristics 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Data-driven hypothesis generation among junior clinical researchers: A comparison of a secondary data analysis with visualization (VIADS) and other tools 95%
- Implementation and Impact of a Diversity Supplement Repository 93%
- Emotional Distress, Stress, Anxiety and the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Early Career Women in Healthcare Sciences Research 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.