Back

Outcome of complex surgical resection and reconstruction for rare thoracic cancers: the clinical value of a predictive score

Pastorino, U.; Leuzzi, G.; Sabia, F.; Girotti, P.; Duranti, L.; Radaelli, S.; Fiore, M.; Stacchiotti, S.; Giannatempo, P.; Salvioni, R.; Gronchi, A.

2022-05-16 surgery
10.1101/2022.05.11.22274955 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundComplex surgical resection and reconstruction for rare thoracic cancers (RTCs) represent a major challenge, given their very low frequency, extreme variability of presentation, multi-modality treatment options and inadequate outcome prediction. We reported the experience of a tertiary referral centre on a consecutive series of RTC patients, to predict outcome by disease and complexity of surgical procedures. MethodsFrom Jan 2003 to Dec 2018, 1122 surgical procedures were performed with curative intent on 952 RTC patients. Study endpoints were: post-operative hospital stay (Pod), 30-day and 90-day mortality, 5-year and 10-year survival (OS). The follow-up was closed at June 2020. ResultsMedian Pod was 8 days, with a 2% 30-day and 3.9% 90-day mortality. Overall survival (OS) was 85.7% at 1 year, 61.7% at 5 years and 50.7% at 10 years. Ten-year OS was 64.8% in low, 58.8% in intermediate, and 42.4% in high complexity score (Log-rank tests p<0.0001); 64.4% in patients with 1 or 2 reconstructions and 32.8% in patients with 3 or more reconstructions; 44.5% with vascular and 48% with chest wall reconstruction; 71.8% in germ cell tumors and 0% in mesothelioma. ConclusionComplex surgical resection and reconstruction was associated with acceptable 90-day mortality and good 10-year survival in all RTCs but mesothelioma. A predictive score based on surgical complexity and cancer type can help the clinical decision making.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.1%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 10%
18.0%
3
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.0%
4
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.0%
5
Infectious Diseases
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 28%
4.3%
7
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
8
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.8%
9
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
10
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
11
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
14
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
18
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
19
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
20
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
22
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.8%
23
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
24
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
25
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%