Localization and removal of nonpalpable contraceptive implants: experience from a teaching hospital in Ethiopia
Abubeker, F. A.; Tufa, T. H.; Belay, L.; Sium, A. F.; Grentzer, J. M.; Welderufael, M. B.; Prager, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundContraceptive implants are highly effective long-acting reversible contraceptive methods with less than 1 pregnancy per 100 women over the duration of use. In most circumstances, insertion and removal of contraceptive implants is a short and safe procedure performed in an ambulatory setting. Nonpalpable implants are a rare occurrence observed in about 1 per 1,000 insertions but pose a significant challenge. Different management strategies for nonpalpable implants have been described. This report aims to present our approach and experience with localization and removal of nonpalpable implants. MethodsWe conducted a facility-based retrospective review of patients evaluated for a nonpalpable contraceptive implant between September 2019 and March 2022 at St. Pauls Hospital Millennium Medical College (SPHMMC) located in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. It is a tertiary teaching hospital with Obstetrics and Gynecology (OBGYN) residency as well as a Family Planning fellowship program. ResultsOf the 68 cases reviewed close to one-third were referred from other health care facilities with the diagnosis of a nonpalpable implant. Twenty-four (35.3%) patients had at least one previous failed attempt at removal before referral. On ultrasound examination, 27 (40.3%) implants were found below the muscle fascia. Implant removal procedures were successfully done at the outpatient clinic in 65 (95.6%) cases including 40/40 (100%) suprafascial and 25/27 (92.6%) subfascial implants. All removals were performed by OBGYNs with subspecialty training in Family Planning (graduates of a family planning fellowship) or current fellows supervised by subspecialists. In all cases managed at the center, no post-procedure complications have been documented. ConclusionOur findings show that meticulous evaluation and careful patient selection are essential for the successful localization and removal of nonpalpable implants in outpatient settings. Blind removal attempts prior to appropriate localization should be avoided and referral pathways to specialty centers should be arranged.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Competency assessment of the medical interns and nurses and prevailing practices to provide family planning services in teaching hospitals in three states of India. 95%
- Uptake of Intrauterine Contraception after Medical Management of First Trimester Incomplete Abortion: A Cross-sectional study in central Uganda 94%
- Prevalence of pregnancy termination and associated factors among married women in Papua New Guinea: a nationally representative cross-sectional survey 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association between Hormonal Contraceptive Use and Lipedema: A Cross-Sectional Study with 637 Brazilian Women 94%
- Influence of Factor V Leiden mutation and Protein C/S deficiencies on preeclampsia among Sudanese women 90%
- A Novel Maxillofacial Technology for Drug Administration-A Randomized Controlled Trial Using Metronidazole. 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Facilitators and barriers to contraception access and use for Hispanic American adolescent women: An integrative literature review 95%
- Predictors of voluntary uptake of modern contraceptive methods in rural Sindh, Pakistan 95%
- Determinants of Modern Contraceptive Use among Married and Sexually Active Unmarried Women aged 15-49 years old in Cambodia: How are geographical and socio-demographic factors associated with access? 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cost saving in primary versus tertiary level of reproductive health services in Sana’a, Yemen 95%
- Positive deviance for promoting dual-method contraceptive use among women in Uganda: a cluster randomized controlled trial 94%
- Knowledge and use of lactational amenorrhea as a family planning method among adolescent mothers in Uganda: a secondary analysis of Demographic and Health Surveys between 2006 and 2016 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.