Back

Use of antihypertensive drugs and breast cancer risk: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study

Zheng, G.; Chattopadhyay, S.; Sundquist, J.; Sundquist, K.; Ji, J.

2022-05-11 oncology
10.1101/2022.05.09.22274758
Show abstract

BackgroundObservational studies regarding the correlation between the use of antihypertensive medication and the risk of breast cancer (BC) reported inconsistent findings. We performed a two-sample Mendelian randomization using instrumental variables to proxy changes in gene expressions of antihypertensive medication targets to interrogate this. MethodsWe assessed the association between single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and drug targetable gene expression with expression quantitative trait loci in blood. Further, we investigated association between the SNPs and BC risk with genome-wide association study summary statistics. We then confirmed the hits from Mendelian randomization with tissue-specific analyses along with additional sensitivity assessments (horizontal pleiotropy, colocalization, multiple tissue enrichment etc.). ResultsThe overall BC risk was decreased 16% with one standard deviation (SD) increase of SLC12A2 gene expression in blood (odds ratio, 0.86, 95% confidential interval, 0.78-0.94). This signal was further confirmed in estrogen receptor positive (ER+) BC (0.85, 0.78-0.94). In addition, one SD increase in expression of PDE1B in blood was associated with 7% increased risk of ER+ BC (1.07, 1.03-1.11). We detected no evidence of horizontal pleiotropy for these associations and the probability of the causal variants being shared between the gene expression and BC risk was 81.5%, 40.5% and 66.8%, respectively. We failed to observe any significant association between other targeted genes and BC risk. ConclusionsUse of antihypertensive medications that target SLC12A2 and PDE1B is associated with increased and decreased BC risk, respectively. FundingThis work was supported by the Swedish Research Council [2018-02400 to K.S., 2020-01175 to J.S., 2021-01187 to J.J.], Cancerfonden [2017 CAN2017/340 to J.J.], Crafoordska Stiftelsen [to J.J.], MAS Cancer [to J.J.], ALF funding from Region Sk[a]ne [to J.J. and K.S.]. The funding body was not involved in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Breast Cancer Research
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
12.4%
2
Cancers
based on 57 papers
Top 2%
10.0%
3
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 1%
10.0%
4
British Journal of Cancer
based on 22 papers
Top 0.2%
10.0%
5
Cancer Medicine
based on 17 papers
Top 0.8%
4.4%
6
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
based on 14 papers
Top 0.5%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
JCO Precision Oncology
based on 11 papers
Top 0.4%
2.9%
8
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 81%
2.8%
9
Clinical Cancer Research
based on 22 papers
Top 2%
2.8%
10
Frontiers in Genetics
based on 32 papers
Top 2%
2.4%
11
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 65%
2.3%
12
The American Journal of Human Genetics
based on 77 papers
Top 5%
2.3%
13
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 27%
2.3%
14
BMC Cancer
based on 21 papers
Top 3%
1.7%
15
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
based on 13 papers
Top 0.9%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Oncology
based on 34 papers
Top 4%
1.5%
17
iScience
based on 74 papers
Top 4%
1.5%
18
Clinical Epigenetics
based on 21 papers
Top 1%
1.3%
19
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
based on 26 papers
Top 3%
1.2%
20
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 15%
1.2%
21
Communications Biology
based on 36 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
22
International Journal of Cancer
based on 18 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
23
International Journal of Epidemiology
based on 65 papers
Top 9%
0.8%
24
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
based on 14 papers
Top 5%
0.7%
25
Journal of Personalized Medicine
based on 17 papers
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Aging
based on 18 papers
Top 5%
0.7%
27
Genetic Epidemiology
based on 14 papers
Top 0.7%
0.7%
28
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
based on 37 papers
Top 5%
0.7%
29
eBioMedicine
based on 82 papers
Top 9%
0.7%