Back

Population-based Oral Cancer Service Screening Disrupted by COVID-19 Pandemic: Observational and Simulation Study

Su, C.-W.; Liu, Y.-T.; Yen, A. M.-F.; Chiu, H.-M.; Chen, T. H.-H.; Hsu, T.-H.; Shih, M.-Y.; Su, W. W.-Y.; Chen, S. L.-S.

2022-05-03 epidemiology
10.1101/2022.05.03.22274618 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundIt is important for understanding the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the missing opportunity for the early detection of oral cancer. This study aimed to assess the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the existing population-based oral cancer (OC) service screening program in Taiwan. MethodsBefore and after COVID-19 pandemic design was used to assess the impact of COVID-19 on the reduction of screening rate, referral rate, and the effectiveness of this OC service screening. Data and analysis after pandemic covered non-VOC period in 2020 and VOC period in 2021 compared to the historical control before pandemic in 2019. ResultsThe screening rate decreased substantially from 26.6% before COVID-19 in 2019 to 16.7% in 2020 and 15.3% in 2021 after pandemic. The reduction of screening rate varied with months, being the most remarkable decline in March (RR=0.61, 95% CI (0.60-0.62)) and June (RR=0.09, 95% CI (0.09-0.10)) in 2021 compared with January. The referral rate was stable at 81.5% in 2020 but it was reduced to 73.1% in 2021. The reduction of screening and referral rate led to the attenuation of effectiveness of advance cancer and mortality attenuated by 4% and 5%, respectively. ConclusionCOVID-19 pandemic disrupted the screening and the referral rate and further led to statistically significant reduction in effectiveness for preventing advanced cancer and death. Appropriate prioritized strategies must be adopted to ameliorate malignant transformation and tumor upstaging due to deference from participation in the screening. FundingThis study was financially supported by Health Promotion Administration of the Ministry of Health and Welfare of Taiwan (A1091116).

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.