Back

Non-Invasive Cancer Detection in Canine Urine through C. elegans Chemotaxis

Namgong, C.; Kim, J. H.; Lee, M.-H.; Midkiff, D.

2022-05-01 cancer biology
10.1101/2022.04.29.490074 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cancer is the leading cause of death of companion animals, and successful early treatment has been a challenge in the veterinary field. We have developed the Non-Invasive Cancer Screening (N.C.S.) Study to perform cancer detection through the analysis of canine urine samples. The test makes use of the strong olfactory system of the nematode C. elegans, which was previously shown to positively respond to urine samples from human cancer patients. We performed a proof-of-concept study to optimize the detection capability in urine samples obtained from dogs with naturally occurring cancers. In this study, we established a scale for identifying the cancer risk based on the magnitude of the chemotaxis index of C. elegans towards a canine urine sample. Through validation, the N.C.S. Study achieved a sensitivity of 85%, showing that it is highly sensitive to indicating the presence of cancer across multiple types of common canine cancers. The test also showed a 93% specificity to cancer samples, indicating a low rate of over-identifying cancer risk. From these results, we have demonstrated the ability to perform low-cost, non-invasive cancer detection in companion animals, a method which can increase the ability to perform cancer diagnosis and treatment.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 5%
28.1%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Disease Models & Mechanisms
139 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.6%
3
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 3%
11.3%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
4
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 28%
4.3%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Journal of Immunological Methods
○ 24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
○ 32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
7
mSphere
● 302 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
8
Frontiers in Oncology
○ 103 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
9
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
○ 69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
10
BMC Microbiology
○ 49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
11
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
◐ 29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
12
Biology Open
● 156 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
13
Cancers
○ 213 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
14
Communications Biology
○ 993 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.1%
15
Frontiers in Immunology
○ 638 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
16
Ecology and Evolution
○ 267 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
17
PNAS Nexus
◐ 159 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
18
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.9%
19
Microbiology Spectrum
● 469 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.9%
20
PeerJ
◐ 308 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.9%
21
Open Biology
● 106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
22
mBio
● 833 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.5%
23
Neoplasia
○ 23 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
24
Biology Methods and Protocols
◐ 61 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
25
Evolutionary Applications
○ 108 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
26
Heliyon
○ 152 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%
27
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
● 393 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.