Back

Sweet taste receptor cells may participate in mucosal immune surveillance

Qin, Y.; Zheng, X.; Tian, S.; Margolskee, R. F.; Sukumaran, S.

2022-04-29 neuroscience
10.1101/2022.04.28.489835 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The oral microbiome is second only to its intestinal counterpart in diversity and abundance, but its effects on taste cells remains largely unexplored. Using single cell RNASeq, we found that mouse taste receptor cells (STRCs) have a gene expression signature reminiscent of Microfold (M) cells, a central player in immune surveillance in the mucosa associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) such as those in the Peyers patch and tonsils. Administration of Tumor Necrosis Factor Ligand Superfamily Member 11 (TNFSF11, also known as RANKL), a growth factor required for differentiation of M cells dramatically increased M cell proliferation and marker gene expression in the taste papillae and in cultured taste organoids from wild type (WT) mice. Taste papillae and organoids from knockout mice lacking Spib (SpibKO), a RANKL-regulated transcription factor required for M cell development and regeneration on the other hand, failed to respond to RANKL. Taste papillae from SpibKO mice also showed reduced expression of NF-{kappa}B signaling pathway components and proinflammatory cytokines and attracted fewer immune cells. However, lipopolysaccharide-induced expression of cytokines was strongly upregulated in SpibKO mice compared to their WT counterparts. Like M cells, STRCs from WT but not SpibKO mice readily took up fluorescently labeled microbeads, a proxy for microbial transcytosis. The proportion of STRCs and other taste cell subtypes are unaltered in SpibKO mice; however, they displayed increased attraction to sweet and umami taste stimuli. We propose that STRCs are involved in immune surveillance at the taste papillae and tune their taste responses to microbial signaling and infection.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.