Back

Non-inferiority of essential medicines for caries arrest and prevention in a school-based program: Results from the CariedAway pragmatic clinical trial

Ruff, R. R.; Barry-Godin, T.; Niederman, R.

2022-04-28 dentistry and oral medicine
10.1101/2022.04.26.22274321 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDental caries is the most common global childhood disease. To control caries, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends school-based caries prevention, and the World Health Organization lists glass ionomer cement and silver diamine fluoride as essential dental medicines. The CariedAway trial tested the comparative effectiveness of these essential medicines when used in a school-based dental care program. MethodsThis cluster-randomized non-inferiority pragmatic trial was conducted in children from 2018 to 2022. Subjects were randomized at the school level to receive either silver diamine fluoride ("simple care") or an active comparator of glass ionomer sealants and atraumatic restorations ("complex care"). All subjects received tooth brushes, fluoride toothpaste, and fluoride varnish. We assessed caries arrest and incidence at two years using mixed-effects multilevel models and two-sample proportion tests with clustering adjustment. Results1398 subjects received treatment and completed follow-up observations after two years. The proportion of subjects with arrested caries in simple and complex groups was 0.56 and 0.46, respectively (difference = -0.11, 95% CI = -0.22, 0.01). Prevention rates for no new caries were 0.81 and 0.82 (difference = 0.01, 95% CI = -0.04, 0.06). ConclusionsOver a two-year, non-intervention period, simple care was non-inferior to complex care for both caries arrest and prevention. Results support the utilization of silver diamine fluoride as an arresting and preventive agent in school-based oral health programs and questions the periodicity of current caries prevention recommendations.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.