Back

Improving the Diagnosis of SIBO Using an At-Home Handheld App Connected Breath Analysis Device (AIRE)

Barahona, G.; Mc Bride, B.; Moran, A.; Hawamdeh, S.; Villatoro, L.; Burns, R.; Konings, B.; Bulat, R.; McKnight, M.; Shortt, C.; Pasricha, P. J.

2022-04-21 gastroenterology
10.1101/2022.04.21.22274143 medRxiv
Show abstract

INTRODUCTIONSmall Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth (SIBO) is a common yet underdiagnosed condition. Lactulose hydrogen breath tests (LHBT) are typically used to detect SIBO; however, current breath testing methods require specialised, expensive equipment and technical support and are either done at a point-of-care facility and/or have to be mailed to a central laboratory. To address these issues a novel hand-held breath analyzer (AIRE(R), FoodMarble) was tested. The aims of this study were first, to perform a technical assessment of the AIRE device, second to compare the performance of the AIRE device against a commercially available mail-in LHBT kit using a zero-inflated negative binomial mixed effect model. METHODSThree AIRE devices were tested with certified test gases covering a diagnostically meaningful range (hydrogen mixed with air at 3 ppm, 10 ppm and 50 ppm). For the clinical study, 36 patients suspected to have SIBO presenting to a tertiary level clinic were provided with an AIRE device and performed concurrent LHBTs at home with a mail-in LHBT kit. RESULTSThe overall average readings (mean {+/-} SD) for the AIRE devices tested at 3 ppm, 10 ppm and 50 ppm H2 were: 3.5 {+/-} 0.7 ppm; 10.7 {+/-} 1.1 ppm and 49.5 {+/-} 2.6 ppm respectively. The overall mean absolute error across the tested devices was 1.2 ppm. A significant positive correlation (r = 0.78, p < 0.001) was demonstrated between AIRE and mail-in kit H2 values. DISCUSSIONThe AIRE device is a compelling alternative to mail-in LHBT kits for the diagnosis of SIBO. The AIRE device may also offer advantages over other traditional breath testing methods.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.