The impact of alternative delivery strategies for novel tuberculosis vaccines in low- and middle-income countries: a modelling study
Clark, R. A.; Mukandavire, C.; Portnoy, A.; Weerasuriya, C. K.; Deol, A.; Scarponi, D.; Iskauskas, A.; Bakker, R.; Quaife, M.; Malhotra, S.; Gebreselassie, N.; Zignol, M.; Hutubessy, R. C. W.; Giersing, B.; Jit, M.; Harris, R. C.; Menzies, N. A.; White, R. G.
Show abstract
BackgroundTuberculosis is a leading infectious cause of death worldwide. Novel vaccines will be required to reach global targets and reverse setbacks from the COVID-19 pandemic. We estimated the impact of novel tuberculosis vaccines in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) under alternative delivery scenarios. MethodsWe calibrated a tuberculosis model to 105 LMICs (93% of global tuberculosis incidence). Vaccine scenarios were implemented as Basecase: routine vaccination of 9-year-olds and a one-time vaccination campaign for ages [≥]10 with country-specific introduction between 2028-2047 and 5-year scale-up to target coverage; Accelerated Scale-up: as Basecase, but all countries introducing in 2025 with instant scale-up; and Routine Only: as Basecase, but routine vaccination only. Vaccines protected against disease for 10-years, with 50% efficacy. FindingsThe Basecase scenario prevented 44.0 (95% uncertainty range=37.2-51.6) million tuberculosis cases, and 5.0 (4.6-5.4) million tuberculosis deaths before 2050, including 2.2 million in the WHO South-East Asian region. The Accelerated Scale-up scenario prevented 65.5 (55.6-76.0) million cases and 7.9 (7.3-8.5) million deaths before 2050. The Routine Only scenario prevented 8.8 (7.6-10.1) million cases and 1.1 (0.9-1.2) million deaths before 2050. InterpretationsNovel tuberculosis vaccines could have substantial impact, which will vary depending on delivery strategy. Including a campaign will be crucial for rapid impact. Accelerated introduction, more similar to the pace of COVID-19 vaccines, could increase lives saved by around 60%. Investment is required to support vaccine development, manufacturing, prompt introduction and scale-up. FundingWHO (2020/985800-0)
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 impact on routine immunisations for vaccine-preventable diseases: Projecting the effect of different routes to recovery 95%
- Within-country age-based prioritisation, global allocation, and public health impact of a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2: a mathematical modelling analysis 94%
- Vaccinating Australia: How long will it take? 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mapping the Existing Body of Knowledge on New and Repurposed TB Vaccine Implementation: A Scoping Review 95%
- Potential impact, costs, and benefits of population-wide screening interventions for tuberculosis in Viet Nam: a mathematical modelling study 95%
- A Deadly Equation: The Global Toll of US TB Funding Cuts 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination in South Africa 95%
- Maternal pertussis immunization and the blunting of routine vaccine effectiveness: A meta-analysis and modeling study 93%
- High residual prevalence of vaccine-serotype Streptococcus pneumoniae carriage after introduction of a pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in Malawi: a prospective serial cross-sectional study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The potential impact of novel tuberculosis vaccine introduction on economic growth in low- and middle-income countries 98%
- Health impact and cost-effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination in Sindh Province, Pakistan 94%
- Cost-effectiveness of screening with transcriptional signatures for incipient TB among U.S. migrants 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.