Dose-response modelling of endemic coronavirus and SARS-CoV-2: human challenge trials reveal the individual variation in susceptibility
Miura, F.; Klinkenberg, D.; Wallinga, J.
Show abstract
We propose a mathematical framework to analyze and interpret the outcomes of human challenge trials. We present plausible infection risks with HCoV-229E and SARS-CoV-2 over a wide range of infectious dose, and suggest ways to improve the design of future trials and to translate its outcomes to the general population. One sentence summaryWe rephrase dose-response models in terms of heterogeneity in susceptibility in order to present the possible range of infection risks for endemic coronaviruses and SARS-CoV-2
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimation of introduction and transmission rates of SARS-CoV-2 in a prospective household study 94%
- The interplay between vaccination and social distancing strategies affects COVID19 population-level outcomes 94%
- Estimating behavioural relaxation induced by COVID-19 vaccines in the first months of their rollout 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A simulation-based approach for estimating the time-dependent reproduction number from temporally aggregated disease incidence time series data 94%
- Quantifying individual-level heterogeneity in infectiousness and susceptibility through household studies 93%
- Assessing the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on SARS-CoV-2 transmission in Belgium by means of an extended SEIQRD model and public mobility data 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of co-circulating pathogens on SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 surveillance: How concurrent epidemics may decrease true SARS-CoV-2 percent positivity 93%
- Reduced effectiveness of repeat influenza vaccination: distinguishing among within-season waning, recent clinical infection, and subclinical infection 92%
- Accounting for imported cases in estimating the time-varying reproductive number of COVID-19 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.