Variation in National COVID-19 Mortality Rates Across Asian Subgroups in the United States, 2020
Xu, J. J.
Show abstract
Provisional U.S. national COVID-19 mortality data for the year 2020 analyzed by the CDC in March 2021 indicated that non-Hispanic Asians fared markedly better overall than other racial/ethnic minority groups-and marginally better than non-Hispanic Whites-in terms of age-adjusted mortality rates. However, Asians in the United States are composed of diverse array of origin subgroups with highly varying social, economic, and environmental experiences, which influence health outcomes. As such, lumping all Asians together into a single category can mask meaningful health disparities among more vulnerable Asian subgroups. To date, there has not been a national-level analysis of COVID-19 mortality outcomes between Asian subgroups. Utilizing final multiple cause of death data for 2020 and population projections from the U.S. Census Bureaus Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement for 2020, crude and age-adjusted national COVID-19 mortality rates, both overall and stratified by sex, were calculated for the six major single-race Asian origin subgroups (Asian Indian, Chinese, Filipino, Japanese, Korean, and Vietnamese) and a catch-all seventh category that comprises the remaining Asian subgroups (Other Asians), contrasting them to the corresponding mortality rates of other racial/ethnic groups. A substantially more nuanced picture emerges when disaggregating Asians into its diverse origin subgroups and stratifying by sex, with Filipino males and Asian males outside of the six major Asian subgroups in particular experiencing markedly higher age-adjusted mortality rates than their White male counterparts, whether comparisons were restricted to their non-Hispanic subsets or not. During the COVID-19 pandemic and in the post-pandemic recovery, it is imperative not to overlook the health needs of vulnerable Asian populations. Public health strategies to mitigate the effects of COVID-19 must avoid viewing Asians as a monolithic entity and recognize the heterogeneous risk profiles within the U.S. Asian population.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Differential Effects of Race/Ethnicity and Social Vulnerability on COVID-19 Positivity, Hospitalization, and Death in the San Francisco Bay Area 96%
- Racial/Ethnic, Biomedical, and Sociodemographic Risk Factors for COVID-19 Positivity and Hospitalization in the San Francisco Bay Area 95%
- Racial, Economic and Health Inequality and COVID-19 Infection in the United States 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of excess deaths and laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 deaths during a large Omicron epidemic in 2022 in Hong Kong 92%
- Analyzing concordance between MUAC, MUACZ, and WHZ in diagnosing acute malnutrition among children under 5 in Somalia 90%
- Association of age at menarche and menopause, reproductive lifespan, and stroke among Chinese women: Results from a national cohort study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing the Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on US Mortality: A County-Level Analysis 94%
- Covid-19 by Race and Ethnicity: A National Cohort Study of 6 Million United States Veterans 92%
- Covid-19 Testing, Hospital Admission, and Intensive Care Among 2,026,227 United States Veterans Aged 54-75 Years 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.