Back

Variation in National COVID-19 Mortality Rates Across Asian Subgroups in the United States, 2020

Xu, J. J.

2022-04-03 public and global health
10.1101/2022.04.02.22273341 medRxiv
Show abstract

Provisional U.S. national COVID-19 mortality data for the year 2020 analyzed by the CDC in March 2021 indicated that non-Hispanic Asians fared markedly better overall than other racial/ethnic minority groups-and marginally better than non-Hispanic Whites-in terms of age-adjusted mortality rates. However, Asians in the United States are composed of diverse array of origin subgroups with highly varying social, economic, and environmental experiences, which influence health outcomes. As such, lumping all Asians together into a single category can mask meaningful health disparities among more vulnerable Asian subgroups. To date, there has not been a national-level analysis of COVID-19 mortality outcomes between Asian subgroups. Utilizing final multiple cause of death data for 2020 and population projections from the U.S. Census Bureaus Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement for 2020, crude and age-adjusted national COVID-19 mortality rates, both overall and stratified by sex, were calculated for the six major single-race Asian origin subgroups (Asian Indian, Chinese, Filipino, Japanese, Korean, and Vietnamese) and a catch-all seventh category that comprises the remaining Asian subgroups (Other Asians), contrasting them to the corresponding mortality rates of other racial/ethnic groups. A substantially more nuanced picture emerges when disaggregating Asians into its diverse origin subgroups and stratifying by sex, with Filipino males and Asian males outside of the six major Asian subgroups in particular experiencing markedly higher age-adjusted mortality rates than their White male counterparts, whether comparisons were restricted to their non-Hispanic subsets or not. During the COVID-19 pandemic and in the post-pandemic recovery, it is imperative not to overlook the health needs of vulnerable Asian populations. Public health strategies to mitigate the effects of COVID-19 must avoid viewing Asians as a monolithic entity and recognize the heterogeneous risk profiles within the U.S. Asian population.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.4%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 4%
12.4%
3
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.3%
5
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.6%
8
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
9
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
10
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.3%
11
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
12
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
13
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
14
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.2%
16
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
17
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
18
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
19
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
20
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
21
Biology of Sex Differences
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
22
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
25
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%