Back

Intubation and Inhospital mortality in trauma patients with Glasgow Coma Scale Score eight or less. A multicenter cohort study.

SONI, K. D.; Bansal, V.; Khajanchi, M.; Veetil, D. K.; Anderson, G.; Rayker, N.; Sarang, B.; David, S.; Gerdin Warnberg, M.; Roy, N.

2022-03-25 emergency medicine
10.1101/2022.03.24.22272861 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMost trauma societies recommend intubation of trauma patients with Glasgow coma scale (GCS) [≤] 8, without robust evidence supporting it. MethodsWe examined the association between intubation and inhopital 30 day mortality in trauma patients arriving with GCS [≤] 8. The data were obtained using the Towards Improved Trauma Care Outcomes (TITCO) registry in India cohort. We compared the outcomes of patients with GCS [≤] 8 who were intubated within one hour after arrival with those who were intubated later or not at all, using multiple analytical approaches to evaluate the consistency of the findings. We also examined the association in multiple subgroups to identify any variability of the effect. ResultsOf 3476 patients who arrived with a GCS [≤] 8, 1671 (48.1%) were intubated within an hour and 1805 (51.9%) were intubated later or not intubated at all. Overall, 1957 (56.3%) patients died in whole cohort. A total of 947 (56.7%) patients died in intubation group and 1010 (56%) died in non intubation group. In the main analysis, there was no significant association between intubation within an hour and mortality(OR=1.18,[CI,0.76-1.84], p value = 0.467). This result was consistent across multiple sensitivity analysis. ConclusionIn this observational study of trauma patients with GCS [≤] 8, who present to tertiary care hospitals, intubation within one hour after arrival was not associated with increased or decreased risk of inhospital mortality compared to intubation after one hour or no intubation. Further studies are needed to precisely evaluate the benefit of intubation and thus supporting the recommendations.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.