Eusocial insect queens show costs of reproduction and transcriptomic signatures of reduced longevity
Collins, D. H.; Prince, D. C.; Donelan, J. L.; Chapman, T.; Bourke, A. F. G.
Show abstract
Eusocial insect queens have been suggested to be counter-examples to the standard evolutionary theory of ageing through lacking costs of reproduction. Using the bumblebee (Bombus terrestris), we tested this hypothesis experimentally against the alternative that costs of reproduction exist in eusocial insect queens, but are latent, resulting in the positive fecundity-longevity relationship typically found in unmanipulated queens. We experimentally increased queens costs of reproduction by removing their eggs, which causes queens to increase their egg-laying rate. Treatment queens had significantly reduced longevity relative to control queens whose egg-laying rate was not increased. In addition, treatment and control queens differed in age-related gene expression based on mRNA-seq in both their overall expression profiles and the expression of ageing-related genes. Remarkably, this occurred principally with respect to relative age, not chronological age. These results provide the first simultaneously phenotypic and transcriptomic experimental evidence of costs of reproduction in queens of eusocial insects and suggest how the genetic pathways underpinning ageing might become remodelled during eusocial evolution.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Mating changes the genital microbiome in both sexes of the common bedbug Cimex lectularius across populations 94%
- Sex-specific transgenerational effects of diet on offspring life history and physiology 94%
- Mitochondrial effects on fertility and longevity in Tigriopus californicus contradict predictions of the mother's curse hypothesis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.