An umbrella review and meta-analysis of the use of renin-angiotensin system drugs and COVID-19 outcomes: what do we know so far?
Kurdi, A.; Weir, N.; Mueller, T.
Show abstract
BackgroundsEvidence from several meta-analyses are still controversial about the effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs)/angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) on COVID-19 outcomes. PurposeUmbrella review of systematic reviews/meta-analysis to provide comprehensive assessment of the effect of ACEIs/ARBs on COVID-19 related outcomes by summarising the currently available evidence. Data SourceMedline (OVID), Embase, Scopus, Cochrane library and medRxiv from inception to 1st February 2021. Study SelectionSystematic reviews with meta-analysis that evaluated the effect of ACEIs/ARBs on COVID-19 related clinical outcomes Data ExtractionTwo reviewers independently extracted the data and assessed studies risk of bias using AMSTAR 2 Critical Appraisal Tool. Data SynthesisPooled estimates were combined using the random-effects meta-analyses model including several sub-group analyses. Overall, 47 reviews were eligible for inclusion. Out of the nine COVID-19 outcomes evaluated, there was significant associations between ACEIs/ARBs use and each of death (OR=0.80, 95%CI=0.75-0.86; I2=51.9%), death/ICU admission as composite outcome (OR=0.86, 95%CI=0.80-0.92; I2=43.9%), severe COVID-19 (OR=0.86, 95%CI=0.78-0.95; I2=68%), and hospitalisation (OR=1.23, 95%CI=1.04-1.46; I2= 76.4%). The significant reduction in death/ICU admission, however, was higher among studies which presented adjusted measure of effects (OR=0.63, 95%CI=0.47-0.84) and were of moderate quality (OR=0.74, 95%CI=0.63-0.85). LimitationsThe effect of unmeasured confounding could not be ruled out. Only 21.3% (n=10) of the studies were of moderate quality. ConclusionCollective evidence from observational studies indicate a good quality evidence on the significant association between ACEIs/ARBs use and reduction in death and death/ICU admission, but poor-quality evidence on both reducing severe COVID-19 and increasing hospitalisation. Our findings further support the current recommendations of not discontinuing ACEIs/ARBs therapy in patients with COVID-19. RegistrationThe study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021233398). Funding SourceNone
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Can we predict the severe course of COVID-19 – a systematic review and meta-analysis of indicators of clinical outcome? 95%
- Laboratory-confirmed respiratory viral infection triggers for acute myocardial infarction and stroke: systematic review protocol 95%
- The protective association between statins use and adverse outcomes among COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Adverse effects of remdesivir, hydroxychloroquine, and lopinavir/ritonavir when used for COVID-19: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials 94%
- Comparison of preprints and final journal publications from COVID-19 Studies: Discrepancies in results reporting and spin in interpretation 94%
- Efficacy and safety of GLP-1 receptor agonists versus SGLT-2 inhibitors in overweight/obese patients with or without diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and network meta-analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative efficacy and safety of pharmacological interventions for the treatment of COVID-19: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of confounder-adjusted 20212 hospitalized patients 94%
- A Systematic Review of Machine Learning-based Prognostic Models for Acute Pancreatitis: Towards Improving Methods and Reporting Quality 93%
- Accuracy and clinical effectiveness of risk prediction tools for pressure injury occurrence: An umbrella review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Preclinical Efficacy in Investigator’s Brochures: Stakeholders’ views on measures to improve Completeness and Robustness 92%
- Antihypertensive Medications and COVID-19 Diagnosis and Mortality: Population-based Case-Control Analysis in the United Kingdom 92%
- A comprehensive assessment of statin discontinuation among patients who concurrently initiate statins and CYP3A4-inhibitor drugs; a multistate transition model 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.