Back

Epidemiology and medical costs of orthopedic conditions in a tertiary hospital in Kenya; A five-year analysis of admission data.

Kihuba, E.

2022-03-21 orthopedics
10.1101/2022.03.20.22272413 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundOrthopedic services are a key component of the surgical healthcare system. Scaling up these services would not only reduce the musculoskeletal diseases burden but also the overall disease burden significantly. As such quality intelligence on epidemiology and costs of orthopedic services should be accurately represented for guiding effective policy formulation and implementation. AimThe aim of the study was to provide a snapshot of the pattern of orthopedic admissions, care and associated medical costs in Kenya. MethodsA retrospective study was conducted reviewing case files of patients admitted to the orthopedic department from 1st January 2015 to 30st November 2019. ResultsThere were 4320 distinct musculoskeletal admission diagnoses among the 3527 admissions. The study shows that trauma accounts for 53.04% of all admissions while joint replacement, shoulder and knee, limb deformities, infection, removal of hardware, ankle and foot and tumour procedures accounts for 15.01%, 8.87%, 7.29%, 6.44%, 3.94% and 3.23% respectively. Joint replacement is the leading diagnosis among patients in the 61 to 75 years age group and fragility fractures and posttraumatic arthritis featured prominently as the key reasons for joint reconstruction. The proportion of admissions with health insurance (60.82%) was exceptionally high compared to the national average (19.59%). However, current financing mechanism provide inadequate social protection against cost of orthopedic surgery. ConclusionThe case volume and mix highlight the growing importance of trauma, fragility fractures and degenerative joint diseases in orthopedic care in developing country set up. Overall, the observed model of care and associated outcome and costs provide a blueprint for orthopedic system development.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.