Selective Decontamination of the Digestive Tract in Invasively Ventilated Patients in an Intensive Care Unit: A protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Hammond, N. E.; Myburgh, J.; Di Tanna, G. L.; Garside, T.; Vlok, R.; Mahendran, S.; Adigbli, D.; Finfer, S.; Goodman, F.; Guyatt, G.; Venkatesh, B.; Seppelt, I.; Delaney, A.
Show abstract
IntroductionThe use of Selective Decontamination of the Digestive Tract (SDD) as a preventative infection-control strategy in invasively ventilated patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) remains low despite numerous randomised controlled trials (RCTs) consistently reporting reductions in interval mortality rates and shorter durations of mechanical ventilation. The Selective Decontamination of the Digestive Tract in the Intensive Care Unit (SuDDICU) cluster cross-over RCT, that includes over 5500 participants randomised to receive a standardised commercial grade SDD interventions or standard care, will be reported in 2022 and will add substantive weight to previous RCT data assessing the effect of SDD on interval mortality compared to standard care. We will conduct an updated systematic review and prospective aggregate data meta-analysis of previous conducted and published RCTs, developed using a protocol and statistical analysis plan completed prior to the completion of the SuDDICU RCT and including the SuDDICU data to present the most current evidence available to guide clinical practice. Methods and analysisWe will include RCTs that compare the effect on hospital mortality and other patient-centred outcomes of treatment with SDD compared to standard care in invasively ventilated adults in the ICU. We will perform a search that includes the electronic databases MEDLINE and EMBASE and clinical trial registries. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts, perform full article reviews and extract study data, with discrepancies resolved by a third reviewer. We will report study characteristics and quantify risk of bias. We will perform random effects Bayesian meta-analyses to provide pooled estimates that SDD improves outcomes, whenever it is feasible to do so. We will evaluate overall certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework. ConclusionThis updated systematic review and prospective meta-analysis will provide clinicians with an expedited assessment of the totality of current evidence about the effect on mortality of using SDD in mechanically ventilated ICU patients.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Helmet noninvasive ventilation for COVID-19 patients (Helmet-COVID): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial 95%
- Criteria to Achieve Safe Antimicrobial Intravenous-to-Oral Switch in Hospitalised Adult Populations: A Systematic Rapid Review 95%
- Optimal duration of antibiotic treatment for community-acquired pneumonia in adults: a systematic review and duration-effect meta-analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prevalence and outcomes of co-infection and super-infection with SARS-CoV-2 and other pathogens: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 94%
- Colchicine use in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
- COVID-19 ICU and mechanical ventilation patient characteristics and outcomes - A systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Statistical Analysis Plan for the Stepped-wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Electronic Early Notification of Sepsis in Hospitalized Ward Patients (SCREEN): a study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial 95%
- Statistical Analysis Plan for the Helmet Non-Invasive Ventilation for COVID-19 Patients (Helmet-COVID) Randomized Controlled Trial 94%
- Electronic early notification of sepsis in hospitalized ward patients: a study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.