Back

Peritoneal M2 macrophage-derived extracellular vesicles as natural multi-target nanotherapeutics to attenuate cytokine storm after severe infections

Liu, J.; Wang, Y.; Liu, S.; Li, L.; Li, L.; Zhou, X.; Wan, M.; Lou, P.; Zhao, M.; Lv, K.; Yuan, Y.; Chen, Y.; Lu, Y.; Cheng, J.

2022-03-14 immunology
10.1101/2022.03.13.484180 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cytokine storm is a primary cause for multiple organ damage and death after severe infections, such as SARS-CoV-2. However, current single cytokine-targeted strategies display limited therapeutic efficacy. Here, we report that peritoneal M2 macrophages-derived extracellular vesicles (M2-EVs) are multi-target nanotherapeutics to resolve cytokine storm. In detail, primary peritoneal M2 macrophages exhibited superior anti-inflammatory potential than immobilized cell lines. Systemically administrated M2-EVs entered major organs and were taken up by phagocytes (e.g., macrophages). M2-EVs treatment effectively reduced excessive cytokine (e.g., TNF- and IL-6) release in vitro and in vivo, thereby attenuated oxidative stress and multiple organ (lung, liver, spleen and kidney) damage in endotoxin-induced cytokine storm. Moreover, M2-EVs simultaneously inhibited multiple key proinflammatory pathways (e.g., NF-{kappa}B, JAK-STAT and p38 MAPK) by regulating complex miRNA-gene and gene-gene networks, and this effect was collectively mediated by many functional cargos (miRNAs and proteins) in EVs. In addition to the direct anti-inflammatory role, human peritoneal M2-EVs expressed angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), a receptor of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, and thus could serve as nanodecoys to prevent SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus infection in vitro. As cell-derived nanomaterials, the therapeutic index of M2-EVs can be further improved by genetic/chemical modification or loading with specific drugs. This study highlights that peritoneal M2-EVs are promising multifunctional nanotherapeutics to attenuate infectious diseases-related cytokine storm.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.