Back

Predicting pneumothorax after lung biopsy from pre-operative imaging using a deep convolutional neural network

Jang, S. J.; Pua, B. B.; Shih, G.

2022-03-10 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2022.03.07.22271554 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPneumothorax remains one of the most common complications after computed tomography (CT)-guided lung biopsies. Radiographic features including bullae and nodule size are possible markers for post-biopsy pneumothorax. We determine whether a convolutional neural network (CNN) can accurately predict a pneumothorax after lung biopsy based on pre-operative imaging alone. MethodsWith institutional review board approval, we retrospectively evaluated 3,822 patients who underwent a CT-guided lung biopsy between 2011 to 2019. Two image sets were created with CT scout images (1300 patients, 650 pneumothoraces) and chest x-rays (CXR) taken within three months pre-procedure (884 patients, 140 pneumothoraces). Using pre-operative images, CNNs of varying layer depths were trained using transfer learning to predict the development of a pneumothorax post-biopsy. Performance against models were compared using sensitivity analysis and the McNemars test. ResultsThe CNN models trained with CT scout images performed near chance. However, the models performed better with CXR radiographs taken within three months pre-biopsy. For the anterior-posterior view, sensitivity was 0.40, specificity was 0.89, PPV was 0.43, and NPV was 0.87 (AUC = 0.67). For the lateral view, sensitivity was 0.40, specificity was 0.80, PPV was 0.32, and NPV was 0.86 (AUC = 0.65). Increasing CNN layers did not affect performance (p > 0.05). ConclusionChest radiographs taken within three months of lung biopsy may provide important radiographic information for CNNs to assess pneumothorax risk in patients prior to CT-guided lung biopsies. However, more baseline and standardized CXRs before biopsies are necessary to create a robust model for clinical application.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.