Back

13 cis retinoic acid improved the outcomes of COVID-19 patients. A randomized clinical trial

Elkazzaz, M. R.; Esam-Eldin Abo-Amer, Y.; Ahmed, A.; Hayadar, T.

2022-03-08 respiratory medicine
10.1101/2022.03.05.22271959 medRxiv
Show abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has infected over 100 million people causing over 2.4 million deaths over the world, and it is still expanding. Given the urgency of the COVID-19 pandemic, the clinical investigation of approved drugs is a promising alternative to find a timely effective treatment. In this randomized trial, we investigated the activity of both oral and aerosolized 13 cis retinoic acid in the treatment of SARS-COV-2 added to standard of care treatment in patients with COVID-19 versus standard of care treatment alone. This was a randomized controlled trial conducted at Kafrelsheikh Universitys Quarantine Hospitals, Egypt. After obtaining informed consent, forty patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 were enrolled in the study. They were randomly assigned to one of two groups: Group I; 20 patients received aerosolized and oral 13 cis retinoic acid plus standard of care treatment (13 cis RA group) and Group II; 20 patients received only standard care treatment as a control group. The two groups were age and gender matched. There was no statistically significant difference between them in any of the baseline characteristics or laboratory parameters. The results showed that there was a high significant difference between the two groups regarding intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mortality and improvement (P<0.05). Only 10.52 % of patients in the 13 cis retinoic acid group needed ICU admission compared to 28.57 % in the control arm. There was no mortality in the 13 cis retinoic acid group, whereas about 14.35% were died in the group II. All patients who received 13 cis retinoic acid noticed a high improvement (P<0.001), and the mean value for clinical improvement was 16.3{+/-}4.5 days. There was no significant difference regarding the laboratory parameters before and after 14 days of treatment in the group of patients received the standard of care treatment (P=0.66). Univariate logistic regression analysis showed overall mortality was significantly related to the patients age, serum ferritin, C-reactive protein, oxygen saturation, the presence of diabetes mellitus, obesity, and abdominal pain. We conclude that 13 cis retinoic acid is a promising drug in the treatment of patients with COVID-19 infection, when added to the standard of care treatment.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.9%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.9%
3
Medical Research Archives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
Medicine
31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
5
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.1%
6
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.5%
8
Journal of Medical Virology
140 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.4%
9
Virology Journal
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
10
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
102 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 39%
2.7%
12
Vaccines
198 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
13
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.2%
14
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
15
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
16
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
17
Annals of Translational Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
18
Genomics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
19
Frontiers in Pediatrics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
20
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
21
Pan African Medical Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
22
Life
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
23
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
25
Clinical and Translational Medicine
31 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
26
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
27
JMIR Formative Research
33 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
European Respiratory Journal
59 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%